10 months ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)2 children
At this point I assume every oh-so special non-White (kike, nigger) is just a communist pushing the kike agenda. Fentanyl Floyd? His existence is based on media lies. Einstein? Too.
Einstein was a midwit, his wife did the math for him because he could not. He just stole together already existing ideas from German physicists.
That oh-so super-genius Einstein kike is literally just ANOTHER (one of many) media fabrication. So is the holohoax.
10 months ago5 points(+0/-0/+5Score on mirror)1 child
Wait until you learn Whites are the Israelites/Hebrews and all of God's promises, blessings and curses were for us and only us. Then push pass the ice wall, viruses, and more and more and more.
I found one: https://birthofanewearthblog.com/albert-einstein-thief-liar-and-plagiarist/
Use yandex.com btw if you look for ANY remotely dissenting things. Google is prone to censorship and manipulation.
This one is also interesting and goes more into breadth: https://birthofanewearthblog.com/facts-about-the-plagiarist-jew-albert-einstein/
> Many people have recognized the impossibility of such a feat, including Einstein himself, and therefore Einstein has led people to believe that many of these ideas came to him in his sleep, out of the blue, because indeed that is the only logical explanation of how an admittedly inept moron could have written such documents at the age of 26 without any real education. THE TRUTH IS: HE STOLE THE IDEAS AND PLAGIARIZED THE PAPERS.
> That the group of men discussed so far were the actual originators of the ideas claimed by Einstein was known by the scientific community all along. In 1940, a group of German physicists meeting in Austria declared that “before Einstein, Aryan scientists like Lorentz, Hasenöhrl, Poincaré, etc., had created the foundations of the theory of relativity.” However the Jewish media did not promote the work of these men. The Jewish media did not promote the work of David Hilbert, but instead they promoted the work of the Jew Albert Einstein.
The first link goes deep into the scientific part, the second includes things like how viciously he treated his wife.
10 months ago7 points(+0/-0/+7Score on mirror)1 child
King Richard the Lionheart 3-0'd Saladin by just running straight at him. Yet jews have made history praise Saladin like he's some kind of exceptional tactician. He was shit compared to us. He couldn't stop Lionheart at all. The French stopped Lionheart, just as they did King Sigismund.
Yeah sadly French (the Israelite tribe of Reuben) was prophesied to be haughty, arrogant and unstable as waters, never to truly thrive. They've done this several times throughout history, including both of those Crusades and even the Flanders Rebellion. "We're superior so if you don't do what we say the way we like it, we won't do it at all." "Oops it didn't work we lost and caused everyone else to lose too"\
Note that this doesn't mean I hate the French. I'm just speaking the facts. Understanding how they work is how you can more effectively use them without them hurting themselves or others. Not even the Hussars had more elite cavalry, it's just that the French never used them properly.\
In King Richard the Lionheart's Crusade, he won two victories against Saladin and was moving southward. He saw that Saladin had retreated to Jerusalem and holed up there. King Richard wanted to move on to Cairo and capture it, because it was poorly defended with most of Saladin's army in Jerusalem and would cut off Saladin's supplies and win the Crusade with minimal losses and risk. The French refused, saying if he didn't march straight on to Jerusalem and fight there, they would leave. King Richard needed the French's forces as they were a large bulk of his army, but the march to Jerusalem was long and the only viable way for the army was through narrow valleys, very vulnerable to Saladin's ambushes and they didn't have enough supplies to make the march. French refused to change their mind, so King Richard went. King Richard couldn't even make it to Jerusalem; they ran out of food before they got there and couldn't forage enough, so they had to turn back. Saladin was shocked at King Richard's blunder and chased after him, which did lead to another battle that Lionheart won, but it cost him so many troops that the Crusade ended in a stalemate and he was forced to return home to deal with rebellions, where he died.\
Much later, in the Crusade against the Ottomans, King Sigismund had one of the mightiest European armies the world had ever seen. As they marched to Nicopolis with an overwhelming advantage, King Sigismund drew out his battle plans to leave the French heavy Cavalry in reserve to answer the traitor Orthodox Serbian knights (Though the Ottomans held the Serbian's family captive, which is why the Serbs had to join the Ottomans). The Serbs didn't have enough knights and weren't nearly as well equipped as the French, and Sigismund's foot was easily capable of winning the fight without the French so long as the Serbs didn't attempt to charge out of fear of the French's retaliation. The French refused the plan. They said if they weren't put in front and used the charge straight at the enemy, they would go home. King Sigismund agreed, but only if they would wait for his scouts to return to report the enemy numbers so he could draw a better lineup. They also refused, and just charged straight ahead without waiting. This caused both of Sigimund's flanks to just retreat and refuse to fight out of fear of not knowing the inferior Ottoman's numbers due to not waiting for the scout, and the French got easily surrounded and held down. Sigismund's foot tried to rush in to save them, but the Serbian cavalry just flanked and routed them before they could, leaving the French to all be cut down to a man and lost the entire Crusade. Which, if you've ever played Kingdom Come: Deliverance, is exactly what set the events of the first game.\
Then we have the Flanders rebellion who were massively outnumbered and ill equipped to deal with the French cavalry. So they dug a bunch of ditches and stakes to help as much as possible, but knew they were going to lose anyway in a last stand. The French refused any battle plans, said they would just charge straight ahead and kill them all. Their crossbowmen tried to arrive first to pick off the Flemish, but the cavalry refused to wait and charged straight into the ditches and spikes. And were slaughtered by the thousands, even the French crossbowmen ended up shooting their own cavalry because of the mess. The French had to retreat and the Flemish won against impossible odds.\
Not to mention the battles of Crecy and Agincourt... where the French did the same thing against outnumbered English longbowmen. The English slaughtered more than 6000 French just by shooting them due to their arrogance. The official records of the Agincourt battle was that the English lost only about 112 men.\
This is history. This is reality. This is what the French repeatedly do because of their nature. It doesn't mean they suck or that we should hate them, but we should understand them to help them as best we can as fellow Whites.
I get it. I had a black that worked with me ask what I thought about "black history month". I told him it was fine, I'll take the other 11. It got the desired effect. I think something similar to that would work better than trying to speak in their retardation
We had running water since 4000 years ago, meanwhile nuggers say they invented everything, all while in Africa they are dying of dysentery because someone took a shit near the brown puddle they all drink from.
Einstein was a midwit, his wife did the math for him because he could not. He just stole together already existing ideas from German physicists.
That oh-so super-genius Einstein kike is literally just ANOTHER (one of many) media fabrication. So is the holohoax.
Use yandex.com btw if you look for ANY remotely dissenting things. Google is prone to censorship and manipulation.
This one is also interesting and goes more into breadth: https://birthofanewearthblog.com/facts-about-the-plagiarist-jew-albert-einstein/
> Many people have recognized the impossibility of such a feat, including Einstein himself, and therefore Einstein has led people to believe that many of these ideas came to him in his sleep, out of the blue, because indeed that is the only logical explanation of how an admittedly inept moron could have written such documents at the age of 26 without any real education. THE TRUTH IS: HE STOLE THE IDEAS AND PLAGIARIZED THE PAPERS.
> That the group of men discussed so far were the actual originators of the ideas claimed by Einstein was known by the scientific community all along. In 1940, a group of German physicists meeting in Austria declared that “before Einstein, Aryan scientists like Lorentz, Hasenöhrl, Poincaré, etc., had created the foundations of the theory of relativity.” However the Jewish media did not promote the work of these men. The Jewish media did not promote the work of David Hilbert, but instead they promoted the work of the Jew Albert Einstein.
The first link goes deep into the scientific part, the second includes things like how viciously he treated his wife.