You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
0
PraiseBeToScience on scored.co
10 months ago0 points(+0/-0)1 child
Okay this is all unrelated and is just explaining why a list could exist, or what it could be used for if it does. But it has no bearing on the initial question on if a list existed at all, or if it did exist, is the government lying about there being one or not.
Nobody can still navigate around the sticky wicket that *by all accounts and timelines*, the internet made up the idea of there being a list before anyone else. No investigation happened, no witnesses came forward, no trials, no testimony.
That means that no matter how remote the possibility, it still is *A* possibility that the internet made up the list, and now the internet is angry the list it made up doesn't exist, and six years of listening to this shit has permanently imprinted it in to your brain that there "must" be one. You don't remember how you first 'knew' about a list, only that you 'know' there is a list.
That's how memory works and it's why witness testimony is considered some of the weakest of all evidence.
>And, your position necessarily requires you to believe the government, Epstein, Maxwell, Mossad, politicians, and celebrities, that they're innocent and wouldn't do these things.
Versus believing who? People on the internet? Alex Jones? 4chan? This forum? Literally all of those lie exactly as much as the government. 4chan fucking invented Q, for fuck's sake. If we put this forum in charge of things, I have zero doubt that it would immediately engage in spinning countless fucking lies and manipulations and coverups of its own.
Everybody is lying about everything, everywhere, all the time. This forum regularly lies about stupid shit. [This was posted a few days ago](https://communities.win/c/ConsumeProduct/p/19BZl2DDza/x/c) and it is entirely fabricated. It's *obvious* it's fabricated, but look at the top comments... outrage and anger, over something that's painfully fake, because "I just want to be mad" emotional rage overrides your brains.
>the massive amounts of evidence that laymen found of human trafficking, pedophilia, and ritual human sacrifice.
How much of that massive amounts of evidence was actually evidence, and how much of it was you being psyopped into believing there was evidence, but there actually really wasn't, and you've lost track of what you were told but only remember *feeling* like there was evidence?
Even this article, which compiles as much of it as possible, fully admits that the evidence is all circumstantial. Creepy paintings and Maria Abrahamovic being a total degenerate doesn't constitute 'massive amounts' of evidence, but at this point, the internet has completely invented its own definition of evidence to compensate for conspiracy theorists being wrong about basically everything, so I have no idea what you mean by 'evidence'.
In my world, evidence is physical, testable, verifiable material links to events.
In the internet's world, "that one Sandy Hook guy had a weird look on his face for five frames that one time" is ironclad unquestionable evidence that "literally all of Sandy Hook was completely fake, nothing happened, there were no kids, there wasn't even a school, the entire town of Sandy Hook is not and never was real, and it was invented specifically so Obama could completely fail to pass any gun control laws, and if you think any of this is stupid, you're a nigger fed kike faggot shill."
You repeatedly malign ConPro, while using ConPro. You call us liars. You appeal to authority against us. You claim we're fooled and only believe the things we do because we want to believe them. You obfuscate clear issues that even laymen can see. You gaslight us into thinking obvious truths are false.
Nobody can still navigate around the sticky wicket that *by all accounts and timelines*, the internet made up the idea of there being a list before anyone else. No investigation happened, no witnesses came forward, no trials, no testimony.
That means that no matter how remote the possibility, it still is *A* possibility that the internet made up the list, and now the internet is angry the list it made up doesn't exist, and six years of listening to this shit has permanently imprinted it in to your brain that there "must" be one. You don't remember how you first 'knew' about a list, only that you 'know' there is a list.
That's how memory works and it's why witness testimony is considered some of the weakest of all evidence.
>And, your position necessarily requires you to believe the government, Epstein, Maxwell, Mossad, politicians, and celebrities, that they're innocent and wouldn't do these things.
Versus believing who? People on the internet? Alex Jones? 4chan? This forum? Literally all of those lie exactly as much as the government. 4chan fucking invented Q, for fuck's sake. If we put this forum in charge of things, I have zero doubt that it would immediately engage in spinning countless fucking lies and manipulations and coverups of its own.
Everybody is lying about everything, everywhere, all the time. This forum regularly lies about stupid shit. [This was posted a few days ago](https://communities.win/c/ConsumeProduct/p/19BZl2DDza/x/c) and it is entirely fabricated. It's *obvious* it's fabricated, but look at the top comments... outrage and anger, over something that's painfully fake, because "I just want to be mad" emotional rage overrides your brains.
>the massive amounts of evidence that laymen found of human trafficking, pedophilia, and ritual human sacrifice.
How much of that massive amounts of evidence was actually evidence, and how much of it was you being psyopped into believing there was evidence, but there actually really wasn't, and you've lost track of what you were told but only remember *feeling* like there was evidence?
https://historyheist.com/pizzagate-the-coded-podesta-emails-pedophile-pizza-restaurants-hillary-clinton-satanic-ritual-sacrifice/3/
Even this article, which compiles as much of it as possible, fully admits that the evidence is all circumstantial. Creepy paintings and Maria Abrahamovic being a total degenerate doesn't constitute 'massive amounts' of evidence, but at this point, the internet has completely invented its own definition of evidence to compensate for conspiracy theorists being wrong about basically everything, so I have no idea what you mean by 'evidence'.
In my world, evidence is physical, testable, verifiable material links to events.
In the internet's world, "that one Sandy Hook guy had a weird look on his face for five frames that one time" is ironclad unquestionable evidence that "literally all of Sandy Hook was completely fake, nothing happened, there were no kids, there wasn't even a school, the entire town of Sandy Hook is not and never was real, and it was invented specifically so Obama could completely fail to pass any gun control laws, and if you think any of this is stupid, you're a nigger fed kike faggot shill."
Why are you here?