New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
60
posted 10 months ago by Yggdrasill on scored.co (+1 / -0 / +59Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
bluewhiteandred on scored.co
10 months ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
opinions on Galatians 3:28?

"There is neither Jew nor Greek: there is neither bond nor free: there is neither male nor female. For you are all one in Christ Jesus."
genesisSOC on scored.co
10 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
Everyone mentioned in Galatians 3:28 is literally White. Note the word "Jew." "Jew" is a modern mistranslation of the word Ἰουδαῖος, which was "Judean" or "Judahite," specifically referring to those of the tribe of Judah, not necessarily someone who just lived in the land of Judea. This is an extremely important distinction because "jew" was never the word used until these mistranslations started. Paul didn't say "jew." The Israelites didn't say "jew." Jesus and His Apostles never said "jew." Jews [are not Israelites or Hebrew, they are Edomites](https://i.ibb.co/6R1J7MdV/5.png), and every Bible verse referring to Esau or Edom applies to today's jews, such as [Obadiah 1:18-21](https://www.bible.com/bible/1/OBA.1.18-21.KJV). [Malachi 1:2-4](https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Malachi%201%3A2-4&version=KJV), and [Romans 9:13](https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Romans%209%3A13&version=KJV). If Paul reminds us of how God loves Whites but hates jews forever, why would He then write later that there is no difference between a modern jew and a White man? In 2 Samuel and 1 Kings, White King David was commanded by God to mass genocide the Philistines (Palestinians) and Edomites (jews) for Israel, only he disobeyed by sparing the women and children out of natural White man's compassion, and then subjugated them into a subsection of Judea called Idumea. This is why jews use matriarchy instead of patriarchy. From there, they used usury to grow in power and status to become most of (but not all) the pharisees and sadducees by Jesus's time, and why He constantly confronted them, like [driving them from the temple](https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew%2021%3A12-17%2CMark%2011%3A15-19%2CLuke%2019%3A45-48%2CJohn%202%3A13-16&version=KJV).\
Jews [only started existing when Esau race mixed with Canaanites](https://i.ibb.co/VYMXxnV9/6.png) and other non-Whites, including Ishmaelites (Arabs), and [jews only began to call themselves Israelites and Hebrews in 1860](https://i.ibb.co/Xx45R9LB/7.png), then shortly thereafter wrote the scofield "bible" which caused today's boomerism thinking they're "God's chosen people" and granted them the modern state of israel. This means [today's Europeans and Americans are the Israelites](https://i.ibb.co/jkHvWryF/15.png), so all of God's promises and blessings refer to them and only them. Which makes sense because we're the only ones in the entire world that have fulfilled ANY of God's promises and prophesies to the Israelites, much less ALL of them. Jews just demonize today by calling it "colonization" then blaming us for all the evils they've done, like slavery. It's literally the only thing that makes the Bible make sense and become true. The Greeks/Romans/Celts/Norse ect. were just the tribes of Dan, Levi and Zebulon who left for Europe/America after Exodus but before Jesus. No one lived in Europe before then. They were prophesied to become pagan before Jesus.\
Remember, a dog born in a stable is not a horse. A nigger born in Europe is not a European. A jew born in Judea is not an Israelite.
bluewhiteandred on scored.co
10 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
Are you a "Christian scientist" (edit: I mixed this up with "Positive Christianity" I think)

Historically, hasn't this view been considered incorrect and heretical?

It seems from the beginning there was more of a universalist racial approach with Catholics, orthodox, and then even the early protestants

An idea of a "white only" Christianity seems like a modern idea contrary to Christian history, tradition, etc.

To me this seems like an extreme reaction in the opposite direction, reacting to something like godless universalist communism
genesisSOC on scored.co
10 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
Literally the opposite. In the beginning, Christians were only White, and they had so few non-Whites to worry about or deal with. Remember, all of North Africa and the Middle East was White before we left it for Europe and America. The Satyrs invaded after we left, just as prophesied. Ethiopia is literally ancient Greek for "White, sun burnt face." "Universalist" never applied to non-Whites. Catholicism only started letting non-Whites in the Church around 1500s when the jesuits subverted it fall to the jewish gates of hell, and Orthodox fell even sooner than that, but the early Church was completely entirely White and was to remain forever so. So "Holy Tradition" = Whites only, and the idea that non-Whites can be saved or should be in the Church is modern jewish antichrist ideology, not unchanged "Holy Tradition" like the Orthodox heretics try to claim today.\
"The light skin colour of today's Europeans is primarily based on non-synonymous SNPs of the genes SLC24A5 and SLC45A2, the geographical origin of which is western Asia and the Near East [Eden]." - Prof. Carsten Carlberg & Andrea Hanel - Skin colour and vitamin D: An update, Experimental Dermatology Volume 29, Issue 9, p. 864- 875, September 2020 (DOI: 10.1111/exd. 14142)\
Note that God never made non-Whites. They don't have the Breath of Life, they're not made in His image, they're fallen angel demons of satan mixed Cain after his curse. And note that if you think non-Whites can be saved, then you have absolutely nothing to reconcile against race mixing with them and letting them live in the West and being your "neighbors." They're just your "brothers and sisters in Christ" so you must "treat them as you want to be treated" and "show them nothing but love and mercy and kindness, never hating them." You can't be against race mixing with them and living among them while also thinking they can be saved; it's as much of a contradiction as saying you love jews but hate communism, or you love to go swimming but hate to get wet.
bluewhiteandred on scored.co
10 months ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
> In the beginning, Christians were only White

I thought they were a mix of jews and gentiles since the beginning

all the apostles were Jewish (non-white):

https://christianity.stackexchange.com/questions/45989/were-the-12-apostles-all-jewish

you can also search online for "black catholic or orthodox saints" and find some black saints here and there

> if you think non-Whites can be saved, then you have absolutely nothing to reconcile against race mixing with them and letting them live in the West and being your "neighbors."

I think this is the issue you're trying to grapple with

The prohibition is generally against Christians marrying non-Christians; interracial marriage is permitted, although up until recently it was "naturally uncommon":

> [In the U.S.] in 2008, interracial marriages accounted for 3.9% of the total number of married couples.

Christians believe in trying to do what God wants, aka God's Will. Is God positively willing people to marry randomly inter-racially? Probably not. But, maybe unfortunate to some natsocs, He may ask some people to marry inter-racially...
genesisSOC on scored.co
10 months ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
>I thought they were a mix of jews and gentiles since the beginning
all the apostles were Jewish (non-white):

You didn't even bother to read any of my points or sources. I already proved all of the Israelites were White, not jewish, including Jesus and His Apostles, and what a jew actually is. "Jew" and "gentiles" don't exist. They're mistranslations. Paul's message and point was to go and tell all the Israelites who left for Europe and America early before Jesus about Jesus, remind them that they are still Israelites despite that and that Christ had come, to stop being pagan. He never went to non-White nations nor was His message ever for them.
>you can also search online for "black catholic or orthodox saints" and find some black saints here and there

All the non-White Catholic "Saints" are retconned after jesuits rewrote history. Orthodox started doing that even sooner. There are no, and have never been, non-White Saints, because there are no non-White Christians. It's literally satan in sheep's clothing, deceiving you into following him to hell.
>I think this is the issue you're trying to grapple with

The issue is what unchanged Holy Tradition Christianity is and how satan redefined it and deceived the world into following his modern jewish antichrist ideology like "equality" and "diversity." I'm reminding you of these basic facts and truths.
>He may ask some people to marry inter-racially...

He never has and never will. Race mixing is the unforgivable sin of blasphemy of the Holy Spirit. How many times has God had to intervene and punish us for race mixing?
Toast message