10 months ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
At least the greek term for the land just east of them "Asuwa" (asia), the nearest section of Anatolia, was precise and they always knew what was being referred to.
You can mention "Asians" and "Asia" today and have no idea who is being referred to. Jeets? Japanese? Indonesians? Pakis? It's a complete mess of geographical and ethnological terminology.
10 months ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)3 children
And? "European" encompasses many differences. Finns and Sicilians and Portuguese are all very different, but can all be described roughly by the same word. I can say "bird" and you'd have no idea if I meant an owl, a starling, or a penguin without further clarification. That doesn't mean the word "bird" is useless. The same is true of "Asian". This is why we have different words for the people in it: Arabs, subcons, Eskimos, Orientals, etc.
With the difference that when you think of "birds" you think of various birds that can fly and sing, you know, like most types do. But when you describe chicken as "birds", that's a little misleading. Alright, perhaps we should subdivide the word into "birds" and "feathered walkers", so that when we use the word "birds" it actually refers to those everybody thinks about.
The same way lumping together absolute subhumans like Indians with decent Orientals is just weird. That's also like calling absolute niggers "Europeans" because they acquired citizenship. I don't like that, which is why I will never refer to muslims or pejeets as "Asians", because I'd have to have malicious intent to mislead to do that. There is no way I'd do that with good consciousness.
they are geographically on a continent but their culture, ethics, intelligence, and everything about them is completely different. Also India/Pakistan are separated by the largest mountain range in the world and the people evolved separately for thousands.
You can mention "Asians" and "Asia" today and have no idea who is being referred to. Jeets? Japanese? Indonesians? Pakis? It's a complete mess of geographical and ethnological terminology.
The same way lumping together absolute subhumans like Indians with decent Orientals is just weird. That's also like calling absolute niggers "Europeans" because they acquired citizenship. I don't like that, which is why I will never refer to muslims or pejeets as "Asians", because I'd have to have malicious intent to mislead to do that. There is no way I'd do that with good consciousness.