There are definitely some smelly gatekeepers working overtime to keep people on the plantation.
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
22 comments:
Toast message
The anti-identitarian individualism - no pattern recognition, no generalizations, etc. - that these nutters wish to push again now that they are losing control of their own golem, the Left, to Left-Wing Identity Politics, is from the Centre, not the Left or Right. Even someone counter-revolutionary like Bonald would be 'Woke Right' according to these dummies.
They need a return to colourblind Centrism to defeat the surging Left-Wing anti-Zionism, one hellbent on defeating an Israel that it perceives as committing the unforgivable sin of oppressing darker peoples. After decades of promoting such beliefs among the Whites, Israel is getting yidded by its own ideological creations. Israel will eventually be lost as collateral damage from all of the yids' anti-White and anti-Rightist narratives, which, with the Left erroneously seeing them as White Rightists of the kind that they themselves promoted Leftism to extinguish, are backfiring spectacularly.
Amusingly, Israel itself should fall afoul of any consistent opposition to the 'Woke Right': for instance, Israel's Constitution dictates that only a yid can become president. The yids are faced with a serious problem: how can they maintain a situation in which they bring about globalization for all of thee whilst the only ethnostate that is permissible is for none but me? All that they do to further the former ends up hindering the latter. The golem that they have created is almost indestructible and does not know when to stop, and now it is stomping all over its creators.
And it's not just jews, but also idiots, traitors and shabbos goys (usually all 3 at once).
While "left" is quite descriptive, I agree that "right" is insufficient, as we are talking about "X" and "everybody else" essentially. We are lumped together with magatards, civic nationalists and in the most idiotic sense equated to be leftists because we name the jew. Or hated by the types of MGTOW because we don't hate all women at baseline.
Communists. Or ‘liberals’ colloquially, because…
>Those whose shared belief "equality" is? It contains communists, "liberals", woke pushers (school, government, corporate, social media, games), the nigger cocksuckers, the "but who picks the cottons then, bigot?!", the feminists. And it's not just jews, but also idiots, traitors and shabbos goys (usually all 3 at once).
…the scope speaks to your point below on “the right” and why a singular word doesn’t work.
>While "left" is quite descriptive
*“Left of what?”* And then you have to *artificially construct a metaphor* because you used spatial terminology for something that exists only in the abstract. Or they’ll ask *“How can a global majority be classified as ‘What was* ***left*** *over once all other categorization was done?’”* and then you run into the same problem. That’s why it doesn’t work.
>We are lumped together with magatards, civic nationalists and in the most idiotic sense equated to be leftists because we name the jew. Or hated by the types of MGTOW because we don't hate all women at baseline.
And that’s why “the left” is *equally* imprecise. There are dozens of leftist flavors. Some of them *aren’t* communists (but also aren’t in power), and so falling into a false dichotomy serves no one. The NSDAP wasn’t “on the right” any more than it was “on the left.”
“Left” and “right” are a **lack** of definition. They don’t tell you what a group is. They tell you what it isn’t. If you say “communists” instead, then you’re actually defining a hard and fast set of parameters into which people or movements can be slotted. “The left” *only* means a *subjective* perspective, not an objective one.
It's a fair issue. The commonality among them is that they are clearly outside of the realm of common sense and reality, and operating against our people.
I'd like to have a good term that describes all types of these lowlifes. I guess "communist" is better than nothing, and generally good, but it is kind of colloquial. But as you said, they are one type of many, so it's not too accurate.
There is reason to not be satisfied with both, "communists" and "the left." Another word would be "egalitarian", but that's possibly too little known.
I hesitate to use that myself because they don’t *actually* support it. Their goal is anything that puts whites at the bottom of the caste system, and they demonstrably exalt nonwhites above whites (Civil Rights Act), so they don’t support (civil) equality. Hell, they’ve even abandoned that messaging themselves–they only talk about ‘equity’ now.
Call people SemitePhiles like it is a dirty word. LOL Emotionally show the disgust on your face as you call them a SemitePhile. Then impale them.
https://youtu.be/hGK2_wWCZX0
For some tips, check out c/TheZOGnald where i try to accumulate all the evidence that Trump is a half breed kike who worships and serves anti-Christ jews.