New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
31
posted 10 months ago by genesisSOC on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +31Score on mirror )
You must log in or sign up to comment
7 comments:
disoriented on scored.co
10 months ago 9 points (+0 / -0 / +9Score on mirror ) 1 child
They haven't even been "jews" for 6,000 years. Their identity has shifted over the millennia since they created their fictitious progenitor Abraham, who was originally Abram, a Chaldean from Ur. Since then, they have called themselves Hebrews, members of the kingdoms of Israel and Judah, and others too numerous to list.

They are a people whose identity is so amorphous that it could be defined as anyone who every lived in the the region known to the Roman as Syria Palaestina. Oh, and the Khazarian origin of the vast majority of jews just makes a mockery of any claim they have of an ethnic ancestry.
genesisSOC on scored.co
10 months ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 2 children
Some of this is right, some of it's not. Abraham absolutely existed, but jews didn't start existing until Esau race mixed with Canaanites and created the Edomites, who they are. They're not the Isrealites, Judahites, or Hebrews, and Ashkenazi/Khazarians only joined them around 700 AD.
BeefyBelisarius on scored.co
10 months ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror ) 1 child
The modern religion they call judaism didn't even exist until after Hadrian flattened Jerusalem and the surviving pharasee leadership fled to Babylon and wrote the talmud. Second Temple religion was something else.
genesisSOC on scored.co
10 months ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
Judaism started in 300 AD with the writing of the talmud, so a bit after Hadrian, but yes Hadrian certainly set it into motion
disoriented on scored.co
10 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
>Abraham absolutely existed

Can that be proved without using the Hebrew/Aramaic scriptures as a source? I don't think any jewish "history" can stand up to scrutiny using only non-jewish sources.
genesisSOC on scored.co
10 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
>Can that be proved without using the Hebrew/Aramaic scriptures as a source? I don't think any jewish "history" can stand up to scrutiny using only non-jewish sources.

[Jews](https://i.ibb.co/jkntkTGt/5.png) are neither [Hebrew](https://i.ibb.co/HJNhxNt/6.png) nor [Aramaic](https://i.ibb.co/bj7Sx6Nm/7.png). Take a look at the Behistun Rock, for example, or even your and the jew's own DNA; European and American Whites are Hebrew, jews are not. I mean even there are even several ancient Egyptian pharaoh mummies with blonde hair blue eyes or red hair green eyes, while King Tut had 99% Western European DNA. Check out the books "The White Races of North Africa" and "Missing Links Discovered in Assyrian Tablets."\
"The light skin colour of today's Europeans is primarily based on non-synonymous SNPs of the genes SLC24A5 and SLC45A2, the geographical origin of which is western Asia and the Near East [Eden]." - Prof. Carsten Carlberg & Andrea Hanel - Skin colour and vitamin D: An update, Experimental Dermatology Volume 29, Issue 9, p. 864- 875, September 2020 (DOI: 10.1111/exd. 14142)
shmuklipoopoo on scored.co
10 months ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
There were several attempts throughout history where gentiles had enough of their Jewish tricks and made them get a job in farming. They even got some land, livestock and tools to get started. What always followed was the jews selling off all their tools and livestock and then complaining that they had nothing to eat.

Always the victim.
Toast message