Consume Product

Men are taller than women, but Susan is taller than Jim. How does that work?

There's three types of wrong answers to this one.

1) Outlier bad! (Susan's a tranny or freak, Jim's a midget)
2) Reboot the rule (Well... Susan aside, men are still taller than women!)
3) Authority vs premise (God made men taller than women, so your question is wrong.)

And the completely obvious answer:
"Some women are taller than some men, duh. That's how generalizations work."

If they're a woman who fails the breakfast question: "Well men are more violent than women!"

-------

Most idiots are on the same tier as not-nigger blacks, and lack all capacity for nuance.

They're the same people who love brands and teams and want to show off their affiliations. You know these people.

No matter how many times you try to explain a nuanced position to them, you're going to fail. They don't understand trends or generalizations. They think NAXALT is a strong counterargument. They can learn chess, but not Magic:tg. They're permachildren. They are >50% of women.

Hey at least they understand the concepts of right and wrong and earning it versus stealing it. These are the useful idiots that literally every movement is built out of.

What do they want? To belong, to be one of the good guys, to be a winner and not a loser, to be in the good category and not the bad category. Whoever controls these idiots controls countries, and they'll listen to anyone who seems like an authority or expert.

Enjoy it. There's still three more tiers of breakfast questions I can produce. I'm building the tools to publicly expose levels of idiocy. Neat!

The levels you'll encounter in adults are 3 (nigger), 4 (conformist), 5 (rationalist), 6 (pluralist), and 7 (realist).