New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
40
The great noticing (twitter.com)
posted 10 months ago by derjudenjager on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +40Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
XBX_X on scored.co
10 months ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror ) 1 child
Buying the multiple terrorism insurance riders is the one that really stops people in their tracks. Normies blindly dismiss the rest, but they understand insurance fraud because they know that if they did it they would go to jail.

That's one of the easiest ways to get people to understand something -- *"What do you think would happen to you if you did that?"*

It just "clicks" in their little monkey brains.
HowDoYouTurnThisOn on scored.co
10 months ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
Before 9-11, muslims blew up a truck beneath one of the WTC building, trying to collapse it. So having insurance against a terrorist attack is not surprising. That was an FBI false flag by the way. The FEDs had an informant on the inside. They let them go through with it.

The part of the terrorism insurance caper that is strange, is that all WTC buildings were under one single policy. The jew claimed that each building stuck was a separate and unrelated terrorist attack. Oddly, the insurance company caved without having to be sued, and paid out double the policy amount. Have you ever heard of an insurance company not being sticklers about every word in the policy. It’s unheard of.
XBX_X on scored.co
10 months ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
The fact that the jew bought six or seven policies weeks before the attack is absolutely suspect. They guy stacked every policy he could. Why? Who buys six or seven home insurance policies two weeks before their house goes up in flames?

Again, if you or I did that we'd have a dozen gov't agencies up our ass!
HowDoYouTurnThisOn on scored.co
10 months ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Maybe a single insurance company couldn’t cover the entirety of replacing a building that was probably worth 40 billion? So he needed coverage from different insurers. I dunno. Not trying to defend the jew, the whole thing reeked.

Silverstein would get uncomfortable when building 7 came up. He had to have been in on the scheme. His explanation that the fire department ‘pulled it’ for safety, and that’s why it fell, after he gave his approval.. is that what firemen do? Carry explosives into burning building? Are they structural engineers on the side? It’s reeking, everyone has gone nose blind.
Toast message