New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
You must log in or sign up to comment
5 comments:
genesisSOC on scored.co
11 months ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 2 children
No one's going to be active until the culture shifts to make it "safer" to do so. So start the movement your self or stop telling others what to do
AmericanExpansionist on scored.co
10 months ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
Are there risks to getting active in a group?

Yes; but as someone who is active in a group, I can tell you that if you're already posting your dissident ideology online you're taking the majority of risks already.
genesisSOC on scored.co
10 months ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
You have to convince them that 1. The risks are minimal enough to not disrupt their "safety" feeling of materialistic life, 2. The chances of winning are both high, clear, and obtainable in a realistic time frame, and 3. Progress is objectively measurable and gradual. And that's AFTER you've convinced the ideology fully supports whatever they currently believe, as most of them are unable to compromise in any way whatsoever, just as GLR often warned. I agree being active is great. Everyone wants to shoot jews and niggers and other non-Whites. But who are the active groups? Where is their power? Where are they naming the jew? What difference are they objectively making? I don't think many people are seeing these, so I'd rather those people still do whatever they can do to help shift the culture, even if it's "shit posting." Telling others to stop doing whatever they can do because it doesn't fit your ideology while also not pursuing your ideology your self as the example is really stupid.
deleted 11 months ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
ImBillCurtis on scored.co
10 months ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
I need to start a local group here.
Make it clear that it’s only for the interest of white males
Toast message