
I trace the rot back to Socrates. What happened since then is that many compounding factors including technology and its uses (e.g. planes and ships allowing hundreds of millions of non-whites to move into European-heritage countries, something once practically impossible), yids and their products (e.g. Marxism, Freudianism), and universalist interpretations of Christianity (that Christianity is for everyone that fits under the human umbrella, not merely whomever the Israelites are or were), exacerbated the decline such that you no longer need to be a genius to see it. You don't need to have a formidable intellect to see it because it becomes more and more obvious as time passes. The internet, in particular, has helped many people who are not observant enough to otherwise see it, to indeed finally see it.
Whenever I see someone who puts a late date on the beginning of the decline, e.g. it was all fine until the 1980s, I think, that is someone who still doesn't get it. He thinks he is 'redpilled' or whatever, but he still just doesn't get it. He doesn't know anything about history, so he assumes that the problem is more recent than it actually is. 'Like, I didn't see it when I was growing up in that decade, so it wasn't around back then, dude.' No, it was there back then. You just weren't aware of it because whatever you were born into, no matter how objectively abnormal it is (abnormal from the perspective of an ideal observer, such as God), is your idea of normal. Much of what you consider normal was radical just a few centuries ago and was non-existent a few centuries before that.
1945 did, however, mark the end of the last time that someone seriously tried to reverse the decline, for the National Socialists (part reaction to and part compromise with the degeneration) indeed tried and failed. (The Left senses something similar in Trumpism, but it simply isn't there.)
The point of all of this online activity on websites like this, really, is the hope that it will lead to enough consensus building to bring about a new reaction, such that 1945 won't be the end of the last time that people tried to fight back. That we can grow our numbers to the extent necessary to win.
What is interesting about this degeneration that it is no longer confined to any particular place. Processes such as colonialism and technologies such as the television and Internet have disembedded it from particular places and re-embedded it into the world at large. Koreans are a few centuries away from practical extinction. Poojidiots are not far from entering into population decline. Even certain African/mulatto places like Cape Verde and certain Caribbean nations are falling or already have fallen into underfertility. Three Asian countries (Taiwan, Nepal, and Thailand) already have same-sex 'marriage', with Japan and the poojidiots not far behind. So nobody is alone anymore. If Whites pull themselves out of this mess while the other races fail to do so, they will actually end up in a very good position in the future.
It really is 'Do or Die', because the end result of degeneration, ultimately, is extinction. That is, we either win (and the degenerates lose) or *everybody* loses. Even the yid loses, because his parasitic nature prevents him from living without the goyim, upon whom he relies for his survival. Thus the extinction of the goy would, amusingly, extinguish the yid. If a particular people do not win, the price that they have to pay is collective death. That is not such a bad price, it is much better than existing in a low state forever, that is, a people having their continued existence guaranteed until the end of time, but also having it guaranteed that they be a bunch of drug-addicted, mentally-ill, racially-mixed queers until said end.
Whenever I see someone who puts a late date on the beginning of the decline, e.g. it was all fine until the 1980s, I think, that is someone who still doesn't get it. He thinks he is 'redpilled' or whatever, but he still just doesn't get it. He doesn't know anything about history, so he assumes that the problem is more recent than it actually is. 'Like, I didn't see it when I was growing up in that decade, so it wasn't around back then, dude.' No, it was there back then. You just weren't aware of it because whatever you were born into, no matter how objectively abnormal it is (abnormal from the perspective of an ideal observer, such as God), is your idea of normal. Much of what you consider normal was radical just a few centuries ago and was non-existent a few centuries before that.
1945 did, however, mark the end of the last time that someone seriously tried to reverse the decline, for the National Socialists (part reaction to and part compromise with the degeneration) indeed tried and failed. (The Left senses something similar in Trumpism, but it simply isn't there.)
The point of all of this online activity on websites like this, really, is the hope that it will lead to enough consensus building to bring about a new reaction, such that 1945 won't be the end of the last time that people tried to fight back. That we can grow our numbers to the extent necessary to win.
What is interesting about this degeneration that it is no longer confined to any particular place. Processes such as colonialism and technologies such as the television and Internet have disembedded it from particular places and re-embedded it into the world at large. Koreans are a few centuries away from practical extinction. Poojidiots are not far from entering into population decline. Even certain African/mulatto places like Cape Verde and certain Caribbean nations are falling or already have fallen into underfertility. Three Asian countries (Taiwan, Nepal, and Thailand) already have same-sex 'marriage', with Japan and the poojidiots not far behind. So nobody is alone anymore. If Whites pull themselves out of this mess while the other races fail to do so, they will actually end up in a very good position in the future.
It really is 'Do or Die', because the end result of degeneration, ultimately, is extinction. That is, we either win (and the degenerates lose) or *everybody* loses. Even the yid loses, because his parasitic nature prevents him from living without the goyim, upon whom he relies for his survival. Thus the extinction of the goy would, amusingly, extinguish the yid. If a particular people do not win, the price that they have to pay is collective death. That is not such a bad price, it is much better than existing in a low state forever, that is, a people having their continued existence guaranteed until the end of time, but also having it guaranteed that they be a bunch of drug-addicted, mentally-ill, racially-mixed queers until said end.
Too bad every single nation out there is affected by pieces of paper and not honor
A close second would be usury/money.