Rule #1: Pajeets are Scammers
(media.scored.co)
AI = Artificial Indians
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
19 comments:
17
27 days ago
17 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+17Score on mirror
)
1 child
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
13
27 days ago
13 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+13Score on mirror
)
Actually Indians
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
I've had quite a bit of direct experience with indian engineers, management, and paper shufflers. as anyone in a technical field does now - so many things are outsourced to india now as their engineering labor rate is ~1/5th of someone living inside the USA or western europe (eastern europe is still cheap and theyre actually quite skilled).
you don't distrust them enough. every single one of them. you don't know how much they resent you and want to crush your nation, your people, and breed you out of existence. they're coming at you with a smile on their face now but it's all fake they want you dead.
you don't distrust them enough. every single one of them. you don't know how much they resent you and want to crush your nation, your people, and breed you out of existence. they're coming at you with a smile on their face now but it's all fake they want you dead.
5 pajeets can't even do close to as much work as 1 white man, which is how you know that the jeet labor scam is first and foremost about killing White people
>5 pajeets can't even do close to as much work as 1 white man
Nineteen-year-old Gukesh pounced on a rare mistake from Carlsen at Finansparken in Stavanger, Norway, to seal the 3-0 victory and secure his first classical victory over the five-time world champion.
When Carlsen was forced to concede, the 34-year-old slammed his hand on the table in a surprise burst of emotion before shaking Gukesh’s hand and leaving the venue quickly, skipping his media duties.
The outburst caused a stunned reaction from the commentators with Carlsen usually known for his calm demeanor.
Carlsen admitted afterwards that he was left confused by his Indian opponent’s tactics.
“I don’t completely understand what (Gukesh’s) concept is here. It seems to me that I just have excellent play,” Carlsen said afterwards.
For Gukesh, who became the youngest-ever world chess champion last year, it was a momentous victory and one which he didn’t think would come.
https://edition.cnn.com/2025/06/02/sport/magnus-carlsen-gukesh-dommaraju-norway-chess-spt-intl
Video: https://x.com/chesscom/status/1929261070616535380
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GUI1c_4sHhg
Nineteen-year-old Gukesh pounced on a rare mistake from Carlsen at Finansparken in Stavanger, Norway, to seal the 3-0 victory and secure his first classical victory over the five-time world champion.
When Carlsen was forced to concede, the 34-year-old slammed his hand on the table in a surprise burst of emotion before shaking Gukesh’s hand and leaving the venue quickly, skipping his media duties.
The outburst caused a stunned reaction from the commentators with Carlsen usually known for his calm demeanor.
Carlsen admitted afterwards that he was left confused by his Indian opponent’s tactics.
“I don’t completely understand what (Gukesh’s) concept is here. It seems to me that I just have excellent play,” Carlsen said afterwards.
For Gukesh, who became the youngest-ever world chess champion last year, it was a momentous victory and one which he didn’t think would come.
https://edition.cnn.com/2025/06/02/sport/magnus-carlsen-gukesh-dommaraju-norway-chess-spt-intl
Video: https://x.com/chesscom/status/1929261070616535380
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GUI1c_4sHhg
Chess... if you have a bazillion people, you'll inevitably end up with good chess players. Also it's just a straight-forward game, you just move pieces and eventually win or lose. There is a lot behind it, but the surface concept is simple enough that it can be watched and understood.
Coding in comparison is something with an uncertain path and goal. You "discover" the path as you go (finding optimal ways to structure code), and the goal may change over time. It is fundamentally difficult because there is almost always a better way to do it. Even if you are pro, this applies.
If I (or rather my parents) dedicated my life to chess since I was very young, I'd be a grandmaster today, or at least an international master. Not necessarily among the top, although I'd aim for it.
But in that case all I could and would do is play a game professionally. That's it - a completely unproductive life. It helps nobody. It creates nothing.
Coding in comparison is something with an uncertain path and goal. You "discover" the path as you go (finding optimal ways to structure code), and the goal may change over time. It is fundamentally difficult because there is almost always a better way to do it. Even if you are pro, this applies.
If I (or rather my parents) dedicated my life to chess since I was very young, I'd be a grandmaster today, or at least an international master. Not necessarily among the top, although I'd aim for it.
But in that case all I could and would do is play a game professionally. That's it - a completely unproductive life. It helps nobody. It creates nothing.
They are terrible. And if given the opportunity would program a machine to kill you intentionally. But they are so bad it would be accidentally
Our ancestors were fools to not wipe them out thousands of years ago when their numbers where smaller.
Lol. Lmao even. I have zero sympathy for (((investors))) in AI companies. I hope more of this shit happens and people eventually wake up to the fact that AI is a cheap parlor trick. All it can ever do is allow people to be slightly lazier as well as replace white collar bullshit jobs. White collar non-bullshit jobs cannot be replaced by AI. And obviously neither can blue collar jobs.
Toast message