https://xcancel.com/MmisterNobody/status/1929349538734600205
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
12 comments:
Would anyone with an advanced degree in biochemistry like to analyze this, or should we stick with truck-drivers and fieldhands who can't define what "fluorescent" even means making wild assumptions based on random guesses, and think an anonymous engagement-farming Twitter account ever actually tells you the truth about anything?
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8454568/
Members of the same team found that simply cooking food will cause the formation of nanostructure carbon quantum dots. And they found it doesn't seem to affect anything.
While I'm sure many of you enjoy your persecution victimhood complex and thinking this is some kind of wicked evil insidious plot to personally ruin your life, given how new the science is on all of this, it's likely just a curious byproduct of a more complicated process.
The same team already discovered it isn't exclusive to just soda, so unless you're willing to believe only half of their studies because you like what it says, but not the others because you don't like them, maybe this is a case where 180 IQ chinamen with advanced degrees should be allowed to explore this, and not people who install septic tanks.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8454568/
Members of the same team found that simply cooking food will cause the formation of nanostructure carbon quantum dots. And they found it doesn't seem to affect anything.
While I'm sure many of you enjoy your persecution victimhood complex and thinking this is some kind of wicked evil insidious plot to personally ruin your life, given how new the science is on all of this, it's likely just a curious byproduct of a more complicated process.
The same team already discovered it isn't exclusive to just soda, so unless you're willing to believe only half of their studies because you like what it says, but not the others because you don't like them, maybe this is a case where 180 IQ chinamen with advanced degrees should be allowed to explore this, and not people who install septic tanks.
Toast message
So why the FUCK? It's some jewish-kabalist moloch worshiping bullshit probably, just to cause harm to people in one way or another.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8454568/
Members of the same team found that simply cooking food will cause the formation of nanostructure carbon quantum dots.
The answers to this are probably extremely complicated, and there's a good chance that these things have no real impact on health whatsoever, but I'm sure everyone here would rather just jump to imaginary conclusions to scream about things.
Unreasonable request. No time for that.
> rather than just screaming nonsense
I asked questions and expressed a suspicion about their actual intents.
> The answers to this are probably extremely complicated
In all your ambition to give a smart answer, you gave none. But what you posted actually *has* an answer:
> For instance, nanotechnology has been used for food quality improvement, shelf-life extension, cost reduction, and nutrition enhancement.
Why do they have to further refine goyslop sugar-water? Clearly "food quality" is already out of the window along with nutritional enhancement. Shelf-life extension... that's a valid reason I guess. Cost reduction is highly questionable (how?).
> Exploration of naturally occurring nanostructures in food is one of the hottest topics in the scientific community. There is much uncertainty on their effect on living organisms.
Oh, so there is actually no certain answer. So they just beta-test with customers.
> contact with these food-borne CDs is very frequent in our daily life.
> In most cases, food-borne CDs were present either in liquid food items or solid food after thermal processing at normal cooking temperatures
So... what's even the point in all of this? And what is that contract with Microsoft about?