29 days ago9 points(+0/-0/+9Score on mirror)2 children
>You need an iq of 160 to understand. (/s)
I mean, I completely agree with the end of “universal franchise.” We can even do it on a gradual basis (with all terms defined immediately at the start of the law). First, only non-net taxpayers lose the vote. If you get more from society than you put into it (denominated monetarily), you don’t get to vote for more things for yourself. This gets rid of almost all nonwhites immediately.
Then after 15 years, the vote can be restricted further to “landowners.” People who live in an apartment count will for this; the point is that those without a physical stake in the survival of the country have no business speaking on the country’s policies. If your name isn’t on a deed or lease, you don’t get to vote. This gets rid of manchildren. Another 15 years after that, with 30 years of social, governmental, and economic changes, it becomes a simple matter to remove the remaining women from the voting rolls.
>BTW, you wrote a book?
Yep. Hanging over my head like a sword of Damocles.
28 days ago-3 points(+0/-0/-3Score on mirror)1 child
> This gets rid of almost all nonwhites immediately.
Typical boomer who thinks non-whites are only on gibs or doing menial work.
Non-whites are taking over all the white collar jobs in every corporation with DEI hiring policies and racial nepotism. Non-whites probably pay more in taxes than White people today in 2025, and if not now it will soon be true.
28 days ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
>nonwhites are taking over all the white collar jobs
Oh gee, let’s take five seconds to reflect on the scenario and consider the *consequences* of the point of divergence, rather than just the immediacy of the moment.
1. Non-net taxpayers lose the vote
2. Voting population refuses to pay for further expansions to welfare (from which they cannot afford to benefit)
3. Voters vote for the drawdown of welfare programs
4. Illegals, et al. forced to deport themselves without welfare **(oh look; the majority of nonwhites)**
5. Net taxpayers, being overwhelmingly white, vote to end all affirmative action programs, forcing nonwhites out of fake positions in companies
6. All wages being higher and welfare being smaller, taxes have no excuse not to be lower; thus the voting population votes to lower taxes
Wow. So hard for a white person to comprehend. What would have happened if, instead of having breakfast this morning, you just shot yourself?
28 days ago-1 points(+0/-0/-1Score on mirror)1 child
I'm telling you that non-whites are going to be net tax payers, [as they are getting all the best / most paying high jobs](https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2023-black-lives-matter-equal-opportunity-corporate-diversity/).
You don't even have the mental capacity to read the point that I'm making, because you're a boomer stuck in the 1980s. You're so stubborn that you formed some opinions decades ago and now you can't change them even if reality came and fucked you in the ass.
> you just shot yourself?
Everytime someone makes a point that you don't agree with you respond with insults, accusations of being a Jew, and you tell people to kill themselves. Your existence is not a benefit for the White race, you only divide people and you prevent racial consciousness to form.
This is the actual reason the abolition movement was a thing, the deranged lunatics who believed in racial equality were originally a fringe minority of what otherwise was a (White) Nationalist movement. Unfortunately after Lincoln got shot, the radical proto-commies of the abolitionist wing took over (who, suprise suprise, were mainly (((Dispensationalists))) who believed that the end of the world was immanent and the Holy Spirit would establish an age of universal equality, which is a heresy that has actually cropped up quite a few times, and I can bet you can imagine where it keeps on coming from, but it never caught much steam until recently). Theres nothing immoral about slavery from a Christian perspective, provided the slaves are well treated and given an opportunity to buy their own freedom or be manumitted after a certain time period if they want to be, but from a Nationalist perspective, having a class of foreign slaves in your country is a demographic time bomb waiting to happen.
BTW, you wrote a book?
I mean, I completely agree with the end of “universal franchise.” We can even do it on a gradual basis (with all terms defined immediately at the start of the law). First, only non-net taxpayers lose the vote. If you get more from society than you put into it (denominated monetarily), you don’t get to vote for more things for yourself. This gets rid of almost all nonwhites immediately.
Then after 15 years, the vote can be restricted further to “landowners.” People who live in an apartment count will for this; the point is that those without a physical stake in the survival of the country have no business speaking on the country’s policies. If your name isn’t on a deed or lease, you don’t get to vote. This gets rid of manchildren. Another 15 years after that, with 30 years of social, governmental, and economic changes, it becomes a simple matter to remove the remaining women from the voting rolls.
>BTW, you wrote a book?
Yep. Hanging over my head like a sword of Damocles.
Typical boomer who thinks non-whites are only on gibs or doing menial work.
Non-whites are taking over all the white collar jobs in every corporation with DEI hiring policies and racial nepotism. Non-whites probably pay more in taxes than White people today in 2025, and if not now it will soon be true.
Oh gee, let’s take five seconds to reflect on the scenario and consider the *consequences* of the point of divergence, rather than just the immediacy of the moment.
1. Non-net taxpayers lose the vote
2. Voting population refuses to pay for further expansions to welfare (from which they cannot afford to benefit)
3. Voters vote for the drawdown of welfare programs
4. Illegals, et al. forced to deport themselves without welfare **(oh look; the majority of nonwhites)**
5. Net taxpayers, being overwhelmingly white, vote to end all affirmative action programs, forcing nonwhites out of fake positions in companies
6. All wages being higher and welfare being smaller, taxes have no excuse not to be lower; thus the voting population votes to lower taxes
Wow. So hard for a white person to comprehend. What would have happened if, instead of having breakfast this morning, you just shot yourself?
You don't even have the mental capacity to read the point that I'm making, because you're a boomer stuck in the 1980s. You're so stubborn that you formed some opinions decades ago and now you can't change them even if reality came and fucked you in the ass.
> you just shot yourself?
Everytime someone makes a point that you don't agree with you respond with insults, accusations of being a Jew, and you tell people to kill themselves. Your existence is not a benefit for the White race, you only divide people and you prevent racial consciousness to form.