You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
7
Tourgen on scored.co
1 year ago7 points(+0/-0/+7Score on mirror)2 children
hoemath is good, but he's still a SIMP in some ways I think he doesn't realize yet. experience will cure that, as he seems analytical and intelligent enough to feel his way thru the smoke-fill hall of mirrors of life.
as far as the courts go - we went wrong when we declared the constitution a "living document" and allowed the courts to interpret it. courts should never, ever determine the meaning of the law. if they are unclear of the meaning and intent, they should only, at most, refer it back to the legislature for clarification. not make rulings that change a laws meaning and intent. including the constitution.
1 year ago3 points(+0/-0/+3Score on mirror)2 children
He is indeed a simp. In a video of his mentioned that he met his girlfriend or wife through twitter because of what he does. It's in the literal sense over for him. Might as well be blind and deaf to what he himself preaches.
The problem with this is that by the time a law becomes "unclear", the legislators who are around to clarify it aren't qualified to clarify it.
We're just seeing the problems of human psychology and language playout. There really isn't any solution.
If you don't see why your example isn't a problem all that would happen is when the democrats have all 3 branches, they'd decide the second amendment wasn't clear and new laws needed to be made to clarify it in which case they'd completely gut the second amendment.
as far as the courts go - we went wrong when we declared the constitution a "living document" and allowed the courts to interpret it. courts should never, ever determine the meaning of the law. if they are unclear of the meaning and intent, they should only, at most, refer it back to the legislature for clarification. not make rulings that change a laws meaning and intent. including the constitution.
We're just seeing the problems of human psychology and language playout. There really isn't any solution.
If you don't see why your example isn't a problem all that would happen is when the democrats have all 3 branches, they'd decide the second amendment wasn't clear and new laws needed to be made to clarify it in which case they'd completely gut the second amendment.