You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
0
MI7BZ3EW on scored.co
1 year ago0 points(+0/-0)1 child
If you're still in AI/ML as a true believer, I can't help you. Get all the money you can and don't take stock. That's my recommendation.
> accident rate
The fact of the matter is no one has fully autonomous vehicles yet and we're not even close. The best we have are cars / trucks that run on a closed circuit until it rains and some enhanced driving features on actual roads. We're nowhere close to what a human driver can do.
Of course, you can prove me wrong. Who has actually developed the self-driving technology? As far as I know, they all need drivers to remain alert or need remote drivers to get them out of a jam from time to time.
> the self driving fleet did it once and learned from it, never repeats it again across the whole fleet.
BS. I call BS. I call BS a thousand times. This has NEVER happened with ANY self-driving technology. Stating something like this shows you have no idea how this technology even works.
What I have seen is someone identifies a fault in the system, a human programmer intervenes and either manually codes in conditions and decisions or parameters, or they just add more training data and hope the new model does slightly better.
I have never heard of anyone even getting close to 90% accuracy with their models. Even beating 80% requires herculean efforts.
The issue is if you turn up the safety factor, the vehicles won't even move. If you turn down the safety factor, you are running over old ladies on bicycles because the car can't tell if it's a bicycle or a pedestrian.
> accident rate
The fact of the matter is no one has fully autonomous vehicles yet and we're not even close. The best we have are cars / trucks that run on a closed circuit until it rains and some enhanced driving features on actual roads. We're nowhere close to what a human driver can do.
Of course, you can prove me wrong. Who has actually developed the self-driving technology? As far as I know, they all need drivers to remain alert or need remote drivers to get them out of a jam from time to time.
> the self driving fleet did it once and learned from it, never repeats it again across the whole fleet.
BS. I call BS. I call BS a thousand times. This has NEVER happened with ANY self-driving technology. Stating something like this shows you have no idea how this technology even works.
What I have seen is someone identifies a fault in the system, a human programmer intervenes and either manually codes in conditions and decisions or parameters, or they just add more training data and hope the new model does slightly better.
I have never heard of anyone even getting close to 90% accuracy with their models. Even beating 80% requires herculean efforts.
The issue is if you turn up the safety factor, the vehicles won't even move. If you turn down the safety factor, you are running over old ladies on bicycles because the car can't tell if it's a bicycle or a pedestrian.
Have fun with that. Cash out while you still can.
How's the weather in Tel Aviv?