You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
0
WEFFaggotsMustDie on scored.co
1 year ago0 points(+0/-0)1 child
>the accident rate for fully human driven cars is over 10x the rate for self driving cars
And who is primarily causing the accidents, I wonder? Especially on a per-capita basis?
>if you would get in a taxi but you wouldn't get in a self driving car, then you're a victim of media misinformation.
There are videos of NIGGERS lying on the front of self-driving taxis that have lone female occupants inside them to prevent them from moving in the hopes of raping them. A human driver would slam on the accelerator or make an attempt to defend its passenger. A robot does not know that some foreign-born rapists are trying to breach the passenger compartment via brute force by taking advantage of a pre-programmed weakness. It does not understand that the "obstruction" it has stopped for is a hostile one and it needs to get moving. It cannot rationalize something so complex that is otherwise second nature to a human of a mature mental age. It's like a house's automated sprinkler system activating itself as a wildfire surrounds it, not knowing how futile its efforts will be.
A plane may fly 95% of its flight on autopilot. I'm still not getting in one that doesn't have a few men in the cockpit. Truth be told, I wish we still had Flight Engineers, but airlines are too jewed to do that nowadays.
His safety record data point is BS. "Autonomous" vehicles are causing all sorts of accidents. They all require the driver to remain alert and attentive. People who spend any amount of time using those features know that it will go haywire from time to time and wander out of the lane or avoid things that aren't there, or completely miss things that are otherwise obvious.
Human drivers are WAY more safe than the current state of the art with autonomous vehicles. They have way more accidents for the amount of time spent driving than humans do.
Remember, even the best AI image recognition software can't hold a candle to a newborn babe in the most basic tasks, such as identifying faces and people.
And who is primarily causing the accidents, I wonder? Especially on a per-capita basis?
>if you would get in a taxi but you wouldn't get in a self driving car, then you're a victim of media misinformation.
There are videos of NIGGERS lying on the front of self-driving taxis that have lone female occupants inside them to prevent them from moving in the hopes of raping them. A human driver would slam on the accelerator or make an attempt to defend its passenger. A robot does not know that some foreign-born rapists are trying to breach the passenger compartment via brute force by taking advantage of a pre-programmed weakness. It does not understand that the "obstruction" it has stopped for is a hostile one and it needs to get moving. It cannot rationalize something so complex that is otherwise second nature to a human of a mature mental age. It's like a house's automated sprinkler system activating itself as a wildfire surrounds it, not knowing how futile its efforts will be.
A plane may fly 95% of its flight on autopilot. I'm still not getting in one that doesn't have a few men in the cockpit. Truth be told, I wish we still had Flight Engineers, but airlines are too jewed to do that nowadays.
Human drivers are WAY more safe than the current state of the art with autonomous vehicles. They have way more accidents for the amount of time spent driving than humans do.
Remember, even the best AI image recognition software can't hold a candle to a newborn babe in the most basic tasks, such as identifying faces and people.