Imagine for a moment that time travel is real. A time traveler decides to go back into the major eras of human history, he first goes back to the 30s to see Hitler in person, then he watches on a balcony as the french revolution sweeps through paris, he goes back to medieval times to check out what england might have been like, he goes to witness the fall of rome, and then he decides to go observe the unfolding of the iron and bronze ages. Finally he has decided :
He goes back to the stone age, over 3 million years ago and sees a man. He takes this man with him in his time machine to the current day. A man who has not gone through the steps of evolution our time traveler has, this stone age man, who is likely violent, and had to be for his bloodline to survive, how would he adapt in 2025? Could he adapt in 2025? Would it be possible at all?
That's exactly what we're doing with blacks. We are taking people who skipped over 3 million years of civilizational advancement, who never evolved beyond the stone age, and sticking them in 2025. And most normies see absolutely no problem with this and expect it to not lead to chaos and disaster.
Niggers on the other hand were selected for strength and brutality.
MacDonald added that living in an easier environment meant that the greatest dangers were other tribes, and this formed the tribal mentality of niggers and sandniggers and of Jews.
> this stone age man, who is likely violent, and had to be for his bloodline to survive
I don't think we can say this at all, if we're talking about an Aryan who lived in northern Europe. The greatest dangers that he had to face in his time was cold and lack of food, and these are dangers that are better faced by cooperating with other humans.
For a nigger on the other hand, the greatest danger came from other niggers (like in American cities today) and that's why he's naturally violent against others of his same species and Aryans.