The book The Sword of Christ (Giles Corey, 2020) is written by a Christian to try to explain to White Supremacists how Christianity can help to stop the White Genocide.
But the book does not do this at all.
There is no analysis of White Genocide, how it is happening, or how to stop it.
The most immediate problem is that White women are being brainwashed by the media to breed with niggers.
Therefore you Christians need to explain how we can use Christian theology to explain to a young White woman that she should not marry a nigger. And then you need to explain to a young White man why he needs to fight to forcibly deport every non-white from our countries.
A second immediate problem of the White Genocide is that White women choose to have a career and adopt cats rather than having babies.
The book explains that racism is not a sin according to Christianity, and that Christianity doesn't demand open borders or the removal of social hierarchies and differences. I agree with this. But this has never been my argument. The arguments that White Supremacists make against Christianity are very simple:
1) If we have all been created by the same Father, that means that a nigger is your brother. If every human(oid) has the same father, that means that we as White people do not inherit our genetic traits and our soul from our ancestors (and therefore we don't transmit our unique racial soul across generations). So why should a White woman breed with a White man, if a random nigger is equally related to her? This sickening Judeo-Christian worldview, that a single creator made all humans on earth, is what led and still leads the Jews to miscegenate more than any other people.
2) If salvation is obtained individually by accepting Jesus Christ, there is no obligation and no advantage in having children. Your immortality is not reached through your children.
The book doesn't touch these things at all, i.e. it does not arm the reader with an ideological foundation for excluding non-whites from his household and land.
It makes some half-assed references to some Old Testament verses, without quoting them or discussing them. There are two problems: the savages that wrote the Bible never had a concept of "race" in the sense of biological inheritance. When God in the Old Testament tells the Jews to not marry foreigners it is explained that it is only to avoid the danger that the Jew who got married or his/her children abandon his/her faith. In fact God tells them to kidnap foreign young girls/babies and breed with them. And second, everything in the Old Testament is said by God to the Jews, at the same time when God said to the Jews that they have to kill or enslave all of the goyim (i.e. us). Therefore nothing in the Old Testament is valid for a Christian (unless you believe that Jews should rule over us); rabbi Paul explicitly said that the old law doesn't apply to the goyim.
The book also doesn't discuss the problem that if we were to impose Christian morality, particularly no sex before marriage, then White's birthrate will drop to zero. Particularly among the "college educated", which are the people we need the most to breed. You cannot seriously believe that anyone except a tiny minority of religious zealots would accept to marry someone without a test drive first. This was working in the middle ages because sex was the only pleasant thing that people (and women in particular) could do, but it could not work today when a man can play videogames or do a million of other things, and a woman can become a cat mum and spend her life doing Powerpoint presentations.
Another issue is that the vast majority of White Europeans are not Christians. Therefore putting forward a Christian identify separates White Americans from our ancestors and puts us closer to Christian niggers. Again, the book doesn't discuss this problem at all.
So what does the book discuss? I'm glad you asked. It goes on a rant against pornography which, hilariously, seems to be the biggest concern for Christians. The Christians believe that a young man or a young woman decides to not have a stable relationship and children because they prefer to watch porn / use sex toys / have casual sex instead (and the solution is simply to ban those things, of course). This is asinine, and having this opinion is clearly the sign of sexual repression or childhood abuse. If someone has such a weak mind to become addicted to pornography, then I as a White Supremacist do not want this person to reproduce. His mental defects need to removed from the gene pool. Ditto for faggots. It's bizarre how Christians insist that faggots need to put their penis in a vagina, while I'm thinking that it's a good thing if faggots are not forced to pass on their defective genes.
In fact, one thing that really made me think is how the author proudly proclaims in the book that Christianity saved his life from an unspecified addiction (I assume alcohol?). You see, if you are too feeble-minded to not be able to put down a bottle, then your opinion is worth less than nothing. How can I trust that you have enough critical thinking skills when you cannot even stop yourself from killing yourself?
And of course, the Jews. The vast majority of the book is recycled material against the Jews. Which was fun to read for me that I hate the Jews (although I already read most of the more detailed source material), but the fact is that Jews are not the most immediate problem today. Niggers and pajeets and bug people are. Jews are not going to outbreed us anytime soon. We lived with them for 2000+ years and if we exclude the specter of Bolshevism in the 20th century they never threatened the immediate destruction of our race like the hordes of niggers invading us and taking our women.
I would still recommend this book to ConPro users because, while completely failing in its stated goal, it still provides some good material against "progressive" Christianity, Christian Zionism, the guilt of slavery, and a tiny bit against Islam. So it's useful if you need to talk to a Christian who believes Christianity demands open borders. It's a decent read for Christian normies.
Final thoughts:
This book confirms my idea once again: Christians don't really care about the White race. This book is not about race, this book is just a rant against the kikes. Christians have a hate boner only against the Jews because they killed rabbi Jesus, and try to associate themselves with White Supremacy exclusively because they feel our increasing power of White racial consciousness, and want to exploit it for their true ends (like imposing sexual morality). Ashamed of their own failures, Christians try to appropriate the achievements of White Supremacy like if it had anything to do with their Jewish religion. In the last 2000 years the only time in which the Jews have been systematically targeted and mass murdered by an army of White men who had a solid ideological foundation that rationalized the mass murder of the Jews, this was done by a group that was certainly not Christian: the Einsatzgruppen led by Reichsführer-SS Heinrich Himmler.
We will rise once again, and you Christians should just stay on the sidelines clutching pearls and reading your Jewish stories while we take care of niggers, shitskins, bug people, and especially the Jews.
Sieg Heil.
But the book does not do this at all.
There is no analysis of White Genocide, how it is happening, or how to stop it.
The most immediate problem is that White women are being brainwashed by the media to breed with niggers.
Therefore you Christians need to explain how we can use Christian theology to explain to a young White woman that she should not marry a nigger. And then you need to explain to a young White man why he needs to fight to forcibly deport every non-white from our countries.
A second immediate problem of the White Genocide is that White women choose to have a career and adopt cats rather than having babies.
The book explains that racism is not a sin according to Christianity, and that Christianity doesn't demand open borders or the removal of social hierarchies and differences. I agree with this. But this has never been my argument. The arguments that White Supremacists make against Christianity are very simple:
1) If we have all been created by the same Father, that means that a nigger is your brother. If every human(oid) has the same father, that means that we as White people do not inherit our genetic traits and our soul from our ancestors (and therefore we don't transmit our unique racial soul across generations). So why should a White woman breed with a White man, if a random nigger is equally related to her? This sickening Judeo-Christian worldview, that a single creator made all humans on earth, is what led and still leads the Jews to miscegenate more than any other people.
2) If salvation is obtained individually by accepting Jesus Christ, there is no obligation and no advantage in having children. Your immortality is not reached through your children.
The book doesn't touch these things at all, i.e. it does not arm the reader with an ideological foundation for excluding non-whites from his household and land.
It makes some half-assed references to some Old Testament verses, without quoting them or discussing them. There are two problems: the savages that wrote the Bible never had a concept of "race" in the sense of biological inheritance. When God in the Old Testament tells the Jews to not marry foreigners it is explained that it is only to avoid the danger that the Jew who got married or his/her children abandon his/her faith. In fact God tells them to kidnap foreign young girls/babies and breed with them. And second, everything in the Old Testament is said by God to the Jews, at the same time when God said to the Jews that they have to kill or enslave all of the goyim (i.e. us). Therefore nothing in the Old Testament is valid for a Christian (unless you believe that Jews should rule over us); rabbi Paul explicitly said that the old law doesn't apply to the goyim.
The book also doesn't discuss the problem that if we were to impose Christian morality, particularly no sex before marriage, then White's birthrate will drop to zero. Particularly among the "college educated", which are the people we need the most to breed. You cannot seriously believe that anyone except a tiny minority of religious zealots would accept to marry someone without a test drive first. This was working in the middle ages because sex was the only pleasant thing that people (and women in particular) could do, but it could not work today when a man can play videogames or do a million of other things, and a woman can become a cat mum and spend her life doing Powerpoint presentations.
Another issue is that the vast majority of White Europeans are not Christians. Therefore putting forward a Christian identify separates White Americans from our ancestors and puts us closer to Christian niggers. Again, the book doesn't discuss this problem at all.
So what does the book discuss? I'm glad you asked. It goes on a rant against pornography which, hilariously, seems to be the biggest concern for Christians. The Christians believe that a young man or a young woman decides to not have a stable relationship and children because they prefer to watch porn / use sex toys / have casual sex instead (and the solution is simply to ban those things, of course). This is asinine, and having this opinion is clearly the sign of sexual repression or childhood abuse. If someone has such a weak mind to become addicted to pornography, then I as a White Supremacist do not want this person to reproduce. His mental defects need to removed from the gene pool. Ditto for faggots. It's bizarre how Christians insist that faggots need to put their penis in a vagina, while I'm thinking that it's a good thing if faggots are not forced to pass on their defective genes.
In fact, one thing that really made me think is how the author proudly proclaims in the book that Christianity saved his life from an unspecified addiction (I assume alcohol?). You see, if you are too feeble-minded to not be able to put down a bottle, then your opinion is worth less than nothing. How can I trust that you have enough critical thinking skills when you cannot even stop yourself from killing yourself?
And of course, the Jews. The vast majority of the book is recycled material against the Jews. Which was fun to read for me that I hate the Jews (although I already read most of the more detailed source material), but the fact is that Jews are not the most immediate problem today. Niggers and pajeets and bug people are. Jews are not going to outbreed us anytime soon. We lived with them for 2000+ years and if we exclude the specter of Bolshevism in the 20th century they never threatened the immediate destruction of our race like the hordes of niggers invading us and taking our women.
I would still recommend this book to ConPro users because, while completely failing in its stated goal, it still provides some good material against "progressive" Christianity, Christian Zionism, the guilt of slavery, and a tiny bit against Islam. So it's useful if you need to talk to a Christian who believes Christianity demands open borders. It's a decent read for Christian normies.
Final thoughts:
This book confirms my idea once again: Christians don't really care about the White race. This book is not about race, this book is just a rant against the kikes. Christians have a hate boner only against the Jews because they killed rabbi Jesus, and try to associate themselves with White Supremacy exclusively because they feel our increasing power of White racial consciousness, and want to exploit it for their true ends (like imposing sexual morality). Ashamed of their own failures, Christians try to appropriate the achievements of White Supremacy like if it had anything to do with their Jewish religion. In the last 2000 years the only time in which the Jews have been systematically targeted and mass murdered by an army of White men who had a solid ideological foundation that rationalized the mass murder of the Jews, this was done by a group that was certainly not Christian: the Einsatzgruppen led by Reichsführer-SS Heinrich Himmler.
We will rise once again, and you Christians should just stay on the sidelines clutching pearls and reading your Jewish stories while we take care of niggers, shitskins, bug people, and especially the Jews.
Sieg Heil.
On the other hand, you must think pretty poorly of your ancestors if you think a sandfly, camel jockey from the Middle East was able to just walk-in and mass convert every single one of your ancestors for over a 1,000 years.
Read the Bible.
> you must think pretty poorly of your ancestors if you think a sandfly, camel jockey from the Middle East was able to just walk-in and mass convert every single one of your ancestors for over a 1,000 years.
Ah yes, I forgot to mention it in my OP.
The book explains how my Aryan ancestors were converted to Christianity through fraud and deception, as Christianity was presented as completely different from what it is. For example they presented Christianity as proud and heroic, and not as a religion for losers.
Can you image Achilles, or Odysseus or even... Captain America (LOL) denying their people and abandoning their honor?
But Peter denies his master, showing that Christianity is for cowards. My ancestors would have never accepted that religion if they had known this.
You are the meme
Does your priest know that you hate niggers? Have you told him or are you too scared that he'll kick you out from his church?
Apostles and missionaries walking around old Europe isn’t “force” and I have a hard time believing our ancestors would be easily convinced (en masse) by a non-white.
Even if what you are saying is true though, a civilization built on lies wouldn’t be able to produce the beautiful Europe we see today (or let’s say 100 years ago before all this BS).