New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
60
posted 1 year ago by XBX_X on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +60Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
shmuklipoopoo on scored.co
1 year ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror ) 1 child
Gotta be pedantic here but replacement by Abos would be re-replacement since they're the original inhabitants. Not that they're not niggerlike, but still.
KyleIsThisTall on scored.co
1 year ago 7 points (+0 / -0 / +7Score on mirror )
No, they are not the "original" inhabitant of AUSTRALIA!

Australia DID NOT EXIST prior to the colonial settlements of the British. THERE WAS NOTHING PRESENT ON THE CONTINENT!
 
These pre-stone age savages didn't even create viable shelters! They mostly just cowered under the flora or maybe if they found a nearby cave. Only a few tribes crafted low thatched huts which were too short in which to stand, and even then only it was observed that not ever member of the tribe possessed access to this luxury.

The contient was mostly uninhabited and there was literally nothing there but a few scant tribes that only eked out a surviving population through r-selected reproduction.
Toast message