New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
I don't imagine in his totality, but I am reading Kants notes on anthropology and he seems surprisingly good in the way he describes culture-making the biological talent for moral agency.

Did he get much else right, or was this just a fluke as everyone held this to be self evident
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Rebooted on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Kant was a product of his times and his views on Republics is the result. For hundreds of years in Europe, monarchies were slowly giving way to more distributed rule ala the Magna Carta, parliaments (initially temporary insitutions to resolve certain issues), etc. A few hundred years of this slow progression existed before Kant, often with decades of setback in a country before proceeding again. Distributed rule therefore likely seemed inevitable to him because no matter how long a monarchy reestablished power, it inevitably gave way again.
Toast message