1 year ago15 points(+0/-0/+15Score on mirror)3 children
doubt it after GSG throttled her page and removed the ability to leave comments
now you can only give money and not say a damn thing, which removes people's power to boast and commentate, if i was her, i'd pull the money before those (((Christians))) take the shekels to themselves
1 year ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)1 child
Gab is a bit of a different case because it openly touted itself as everything its critics hated. So the case for censorship, regarding a website that was explicitly created to host those viewpoints, is a bit more egregious.
I don't know what the motives for GsG are. There's a very good chance that they aren't good. But I'm just saying that censoring comments in and of itself is not a good indicator of those motives because, well, it could be for any number of reasons. They can and will pull certs on problem websites, or google will just outright ban them. If i were in the same situation I might play it carefully too.
It was to lessen the attack surface of GSG from ZOG, so as to a) not put her acces to the funds raised for her at risk, and b) keep the fundraising going.
IOW, comments were closed to prevent Give Send Go from being as de-banked as thoroughly as Gab was in 2017-2018, which would ruin the utility of GSG.
Resilient payment processing is still a weak link for the alt right tech space, and no one seems to breaking through with a solution. Gab tried with Gab Pay, but it doesn't seem to have picked up many users.
yeah, theoretically i guess that's correct. And theoretically the united states has free speech (with (((Consequences))) ). she's not a single mother by the way.
now you can only give money and not say a damn thing, which removes people's power to boast and commentate, if i was her, i'd pull the money before those (((Christians))) take the shekels to themselves
Leaving the comments up gives people a reason to pount at GSG and shriek at it, making the website a lot more vulnerable to being taken down.
give them a finger, and they'll take the whole arm.
I don't know what the motives for GsG are. There's a very good chance that they aren't good. But I'm just saying that censoring comments in and of itself is not a good indicator of those motives because, well, it could be for any number of reasons. They can and will pull certs on problem websites, or google will just outright ban them. If i were in the same situation I might play it carefully too.
https://x.com/Tomhennessey69/status/1918529725649113201
It was to lessen the attack surface of GSG from ZOG, so as to a) not put her acces to the funds raised for her at risk, and b) keep the fundraising going.
IOW, comments were closed to prevent Give Send Go from being as de-banked as thoroughly as Gab was in 2017-2018, which would ruin the utility of GSG.
Resilient payment processing is still a weak link for the alt right tech space, and no one seems to breaking through with a solution. Gab tried with Gab Pay, but it doesn't seem to have picked up many users.