New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
39
posted 1 year ago by RJ567 on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +39Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
13
TallestSkil on scored.co
1 year ago 13 points (+0 / -0 / +13Score on mirror )
This is a roundabout way to apply biological reality to the social sciences. It’s naturally derivative from biological reality (in that it becomes self-evidence once biological reality is internalized), but is it *useful* to highlight if you’re not going to expressly highlight said reality?

Humanity is five species. Species competing for the same resources in the same ecological niche will fight until all but one is made extinct. Whites are not fighting. Whites are going extinct.

It’s literally that simple. It may be useful to highlight “crime doesn’t exist between the races (species),” but only insofar as you, in so doing, are explicitly making the ultimate statement: **All nonwhites have to be made extinct, otherwise we will never be safe and we will have axiomatically lost forever.**

Any social policy that does not advance the extinction of the other species of humanity will *intrinsically* cause the extinction of whites. That’s what people need to internalize.
Toast message