New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
12
For those who think Germany wouldn't have kept territory. (Further explanation in comments) (joeldavis.substack.com)
posted 1 year ago by AmericanExpansionist on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +12Score on mirror )
7 comments
Permalink
Mirrored from scored.co
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
9
TallestSkil on scored.co
1 year ago 9 points (+0 / -0 / +9Score on mirror ) 1 child
Wouldn’t have “conquered the whole world,” like jews claim. Would have kept territory, specifically Elsaß-Lothrigen, the rest of the land taken in WWI, and probably part of Poland and Crimea. There’s a difference.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
7
GoldenInnosStatue on scored.co
1 year ago 7 points (+0 / -0 / +7Score on mirror ) 1 child
tbh, looking at the state of poorland and Jewkraine, they'd be overjoy'd to be governed by actual Germans and not Ashkenazi kikes
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
3
Mellop on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
Neither were even real countries before the end of WWI.
Poland was arbitrarily carved out to spite Germany and Russia alike - just like Napoleon had done before.
And Ukraine, as the name suggests, was simply the borderlands of the Russian Empire.

If redrawing borders was legitimate in 1918, it was equally legitimate in 1939, plain and simple.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
Toast message