Semi-literate bantu
(pomf2.lain.la)
i fucking hate niggers
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
20 comments:
12
1 year ago
12 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+12Score on mirror
)
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
No matter what the nigger does, even murder, when a white person calls the nigger out for doing it is considered evil, and more detrimental to society than what the nigger actually did. I’m so tired of this shit.
Nigger is beating/raping someone to death, and the victim calls them a nigger while they’re doing it, and the victim instantly becomes the baddie and deserves death.
Nigger is beating/raping someone to death, and the victim calls them a nigger while they’re doing it, and the victim instantly becomes the baddie and deserves death.
The difference between "semi-literate" and "semi-illiterate" is semi-amusing.
Yes. I care more about a single wild flower than about all niggers in existence combined. And with "care" I mean positive empathy, not that TND is off the table.
Someone once asked me if I thought it was appropriate to Minecraft a 12 year old if I caught them “unarmed” entering my property, and stealing something at night. I said if they’re white, and I’m in a good mood, maybe not, but if it’s a nigger, which statistically it will be, MOST DEFINITELY, and then I’ll be in a good mood for sure. 😁
This is a valid use of the english language. This is the equivalent to claiming "the glass is half full" is the only right way to say it, and ridiculing those who say "the glass is half empty".
I bet you think "illiterate" and "not literate" are also interchangeable.
I do.
"Ill", the prefix, is "bad/sick". This includes all magnitudes, from a little to all the way bad.
The question i have is, why don't you think they are interchangeable?
"Ill", the prefix, is "bad/sick". This includes all magnitudes, from a little to all the way bad.
The question i have is, why don't you think they are interchangeable?
Well, retard, you're wrong. "Illiterate" means "unable to read", and "not literate" means that a person has not read enough of the right literature. Often there is a bit more context involved with the latter, such as, "Frank is not literate in [something]", but it can also be used without extra context, and is then usually more of a judgement of a person's level of well-read-ness.
> Well, retard, you're wrong.
Spoken like a true intellectual.
> "Illiterate" means "unable to read", and "not literate" means that a person has not read enough of the right literature
Fascinating distinction. I don't see any reason for that to be the case semantically (and the definition of literate makes that clear), but i can appreciate that it is nonetheless colloquially true.
"Not literate" still **literally** means "not able to read", even if colloquially/idiomatically it has another connotation.
Spoken like a true intellectual.
> "Illiterate" means "unable to read", and "not literate" means that a person has not read enough of the right literature
Fascinating distinction. I don't see any reason for that to be the case semantically (and the definition of literate makes that clear), but i can appreciate that it is nonetheless colloquially true.
"Not literate" still **literally** means "not able to read", even if colloquially/idiomatically it has another connotation.
no. consider the semi-circle.
or semi-automatic.
or semi-final.
or semi-automatic.
or semi-final.
Toast message