I know they’re very similar and the terms are often interchangeable. But I honestly cannot find a reliable definition no matter how hard I try. People always say National Socialism is just a more “extreme” form of Fascism. That doesn’t sound correct to me.
The closest answer I can come to is that the Italians and Spanish had less of a jew problem than the Germans did. They had a communist problem, from what I can tell. Communist basically equals jew, but I’m not sure if they made that connection. Therefore, because of the infiltration of non-German peoples and the subversion they brought, the Germans had a stricter view on race and blood and soil, at least to my knowledge.
I’m also not sure if they differed economically and how much they may have differed.
Again, I see people on here and other places using both terms interchangeably, even when talking about them in a positive light, and I never bothered to do the research. If you could enlighten me and push me in the right direction (books, articles, etc.), that would be very much appreciated.
[This is how the NatSoc defined National Socialism and this is the definition you must use and quote when debating National Socialism.](https://i.imgur.com/0eWOSIc.jpeg)
Hitler was the world's leading expert on Hilter. Don't allow any greasy kikes to misrepresent Hitler's National Socialism or allow them to tell you what Hitler "really believed".