1 year ago3 points(+0/-0/+3Score on mirror)1 child
Well, that is kinda misogynistic, but you have a point.
Let me rephrase:
MOST aborted children would have grown to be evil, but there were certainly some children who would have grown up to be good if it were not for them getting torn apart by doctor Shek L. Stein.
1 year ago5 points(+0/-0/+5Score on mirror)1 child
Of course it's misogynistic, because misogyny is objectively correct. Women need a father or husband to guide her and protect her from her own tendency to make horrible choices. And that's why feminism is the worst thing to ever happen to women.
An evil tree can not produce good fruit.
A tree willing to murder it's own fruit is an evil tree.
If an aborted child had lived, it would be raised by evil parents, and it would likely grow to be as evil as them.
Say it with me:
"And nothing of value was lost."
Let me rephrase:
MOST aborted children would have grown to be evil, but there were certainly some children who would have grown up to be good if it were not for them getting torn apart by doctor Shek L. Stein.
Juxtaposing the position has the opposite effect.
Pretty darn clear, if you ask me.
Parents who are willing to murder their own children are terrible parents and would raise terrible children.
A society where "people" are raised by "people" like that wpuld probably become the new sodom and gomorrah.