More Niglets
(twitter.com)
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Toast message
The issue is HOW we raise kids because we have been told to do it a certain way.
They don't need a bunch of clothes. They don't need a Playstation. They don't need all the costs involved with out of home schooling. They don't NEED any of that crap.
If raised properly they become an asset to the family young. Teach them chores. Use them to produce food. Use them to produce items and resources and assets. Train them to be useful and intelligent.
And the more you have the cheaper they get as long as you're not being a consumeproduct disposable culture buypig. Those clothes go to the younger one. These books can be reread. The older ones help care for the younger ones. And the cycle feeds itself.
They don't need a bunch of clothes. They don't need a Playstation. They don't need all the costs involved with out of home schooling. They don't NEED any of that crap.”
You’re not wrong, but you’re also living in fantasy land. The only way this works is if you completely shield your kids from the outside world which, unless you’re Amish, is basically impossible. I mean, are you really never going to let your kid roam free, and go by friends houses to hang out? IMHO, this is the equivalent of saying they’ll never let their kids have sugar, and other goyslop which is wonderful, but unrealistic. Some of my best memories were renting games and movies on Fridays to have pizza nights with my friends.
The pint I’m trying to make is yeah, while it’s not nearly as expensive to raise a kid as people say, if you don’t participate in all the normal kikery and normy shit daily, it’s definitely more expensive overall then it was 30 plus years ago. I mean, everything is. If whites would stop being so hesitant to strategically use the kiked system that’s in place already, this wouldn’t even be a discussion. Whites could live good decent life without stressing over money at all, and the mother could stay home, maybe homeschool, and maybe do something on the side if she likes.
None of this even includes “higher education” if your kid chooses that path. If you have young girls, good luck with that, because they are the easiest to manipulate into the consumer lifestyle. It’s easy to talk shit about teaching, and raising them right, but you have everything, and everyone against you unless you keep them Amish. I’m not saying it’s possible, I’m just saying get ready for a very difficult stressful life unless you’re very lucky.
It's too dangerous outside and any friends they have would be a degenerate influence on them.
>IMHO, this is the equivalent of saying they’ll never let their kids have sugar, and other goyslop which is wonderful, but unrealistic. Some of my best memories were renting games and movies on Fridays to have pizza nights with my friends.
Completely different, denying one of the five basic tastes arbitrarily is child abuse, that's like saying you'd never let your child have anything sour, it's fucking insane.
That is why this will benefit idiots with low impulse control.
It should be reserved for married couples that live above the poverty line.