1 year ago20 points(+0/-0/+20Score on mirror)2 children
I'll be praying for them to get a guy who is hardcore and ultra trad. But I know that's probably lower odds than winning the lottery at this point. The jewsuits are entrenched now.
Amusingly, hope may not be completely lost, even for the Jesuits. I was listening to EWTN radio a few weeks ago and a couple of guys were discussing how the Gregorian hymnal publications had been bought up by non-Christian publishers after Vatican 2, and one of them, who was a Jesuit, all but named the jews who had done the buying up. (((they))) were able to get their claws on the south american jesuit seminaries, but its possible theres some that remained untouched.
1 year ago9 points(+0/-0/+9Score on mirror)2 children
The foot washing ritual was originally only for other priests, especially poor priests. So, a bishop would wash the feet of other fellow priests, as Jesus washed his disciples feet, not random peoples feet. And none of that included kissing feet. Then Bugnini persuaded Pius XII to change it, "to get people involved", and then it went downhill from there.
I personally don't want a neocon-trad pope, because it muddies the water. It would be better to have another uber-gay pope, so that people have come to terms with the fact that they don't have to leave their brains at the church door and blindly follow the pope OR an ultra-trad pope a la Pius X who cleans house. The worst option would be a neocon pope like Benedict or JPII. It's seriously amazing how many people, even "trads", and even SSPX priests, think that this guy wields authority while he doesn't even know which religion is true.
1 year ago3 points(+0/-0/+3Score on mirror)2 children
That man wanted to come along with Jesus but Jesus forbid him and told him to instead go back and tell what Jesus had done to exorcise Legion out of him.
But this fraud pope? He would have washed feet while Legion was still inside that man and the demons would have taken glee from it.
Why did Jesus not wash the feet of the money exchangers instead of violently flipping their tables and physically assaulting them and throwing them out of the temple?
Also, if Jesus Christ is sinless, and never committed any sin, this means that physically throwing greedy jews out of the temple is not a sin.
Is it possible he didn’t because Jesus was never about “collecting followers”? In Mark and many other gospels, Jesus repeatedly tells the people he performs miracles on “go. And tell no one what you saw here”.
Its bizzare to see a historically grand figure like the pope kissing the feet of a random evil nigger invader. Its probably done to demoralize believers and denigrate the position.
Just like senile pedo sniffy child fondling shitty pants fall down the stairs Joe Biden. And having faggots getting live stream ass fucked in the congressional chambers. You still respect the office or the congressional chambers anymore?
>think that this guy wields authority while he doesn't even know which religion is true
Oh, I think he knows that the Church is right, the issue is that the boomer/goyest gen Popes all suffered from massive Human Fear (which is probably what led to the Assisi kerfuffle, rather than outright heresy), which is probably one of the worst vices to have in this age, because the jews know how to pull the levers of anyone who suffers from it, no matter how saintly he may be in every other area of his life.
Reminder that when he was installed as the false pope that the previous pope was still alive. LIterally the antipope.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=FxxhAS16vB0
he died easter monday I thought I read (so, probably in the night time)
I would hope symbolically this means the Church will be resurrected from the kind of "crucifixion" that has taken place with respect to modernist Vatican 2 attacks on Catholic belief and practice
my thoughts on his death in general:
"Pope" Francis Dies at Age 88
Considered by a growing minority as a non-Catholic antipope who continued the "Vatican 2" revolt against Catholicism, the late "Francis" in our view continually pushed heterodox ideology at odds with traditional Catholic belief and practice.
While I do not necessarily agree with the all these critiques of him or how they're delivered, here's a laundry list of articles that viewed him in the most negative light, from a "traditional Catholic" (sedevacantist) perspective: https://novusordowatch.org/francis/
It would be nice to see at this point before a new "pope" is elected to continue the confusion, of there being a global rejection of Vatican 2's "reforms" and of there then being a conclave to elect an unquestionably Catholic pope.
strange. nothing about his death shows up in the search engine at startpage
all i see is vance met with him. they disagreed over migration. chocolate eggs for kids. https://apnews.com/article/pope-vance-us-migration-c9fc577cabff138de7bd8026133994fc
Modernist Bishops, including the Pope, seem to forget the entire point of the foot washing was the first Bishops learning that they should lead by example, amongst each other. The ceremony is supposed to be done between Bishops, because every single man present at the last supper betting his feet washed was a Bishop. Its not supposed to be a pharisaic self-aggrandizing through false humility ritual, its supposed to remind the Shepherds that their duty is to get their hands dirty instead of sitting back and letting the faithful be devoured by (((wolves))). Having the faithful wash each other's feet or washing the feet of random non-Christians is completely missing the point of the Ritual.
That sounds 100% plausible.
Amusingly, hope may not be completely lost, even for the Jesuits. I was listening to EWTN radio a few weeks ago and a couple of guys were discussing how the Gregorian hymnal publications had been bought up by non-Christian publishers after Vatican 2, and one of them, who was a Jesuit, all but named the jews who had done the buying up. (((they))) were able to get their claws on the south american jesuit seminaries, but its possible theres some that remained untouched.