Consume Product

In nature there are species classified as parasites, which attach themselves to or live inside the bodies of another species, slowly draining away its nutrients or stealing some of its resources, at a minimum of effort to the parasite itself. There’s an isopod which, upon meeting a fish, enters through the gills, eats its tongue, and attaches itself to the stump. The parasite’s body thus replaces the fish’s tongue–allowing the fish to continue to eat–while it feeds off the fish’s blood. If fish could talk, one wonders what the parasitic tongue might say in its stead…

There are others known as brood parasites, which do not prey directly upon individuals of other species. The cuckoo bird is perhaps the most well-known example. It lays its eggs in the nests of other birds, which are then fed by the other species upon hatching. If the cuckoo decides that too many eggs already exist in the nest, it will knock one or more onto the ground to ensure its own egg is properly fed at the expense of the other species’ children. These parasites fill ecological niches. They found opportunities to survive and took them.
As humans are a part of nature, no matter how we feel otherwise, we are similarly subject to its constraints and possibilities. In our societies, we have “niches.” These are a microcosm of the niches seen in broader ecology. We have humans who obtain resources (farmers, miners, fishers), humans who move resources (truck drivers, pilots, ship captains), humans who transform resources (manufacturers, chemical engineers, packaging firms), and humans who coordinate these and other activities (bureaucrats, moguls, statesmen). There are parasites in human societies, too.

Certainly, we see lone individuals breaching etiquette and engaging in criminal activity–petty burglars, con men, profiteering middlemen, economic skimmers, and the like. We also have entire classes–groups, castes, etc.–of parasites operating within human society. These parasites thrive on their ambiguity. For them, it is important not to be seen as parasites, lest the larger, stronger community of normal, healthy people cast them out. Some fail at this, which is how we catch criminals–both petty and ponzi. But if society knows nothing about ourselves or our place in nature, it becomes impossible for us to recognize these individuals–or entire groups–as the ecological parasites they are.

As previously mentioned, European societies are extremely high commonweal. Whites were bred in an environment that requires deep trust between members of a village, town, or city to survive every winter. With the knowledge that every member of the group has to pull his weight or none will survive, it became a subconscious expectation to treat “someone who looks like you” as equivalent to you for your own benefit. This deep-seated belief survives today, even in the tattered remains of traditional Western society. Because societal trust is so ingrained in who whites are, duplicity is hard for us to detect. This opens an ecological niche. If whites have trouble distrusting those who aren’t like them, then those who aren’t like them can more easily take advantage of–become parasites of–the production, resources, and benefits of European societies. How? By simply pretending to be “one of us.” Jews fill this ecological niche.

Many jews look extremely similar to whites, but appearance is now almost irrelevant–just as with the cuckoo or the cowbird, whose eggs and offspring look nothing like that of the species whose nests they invade. The similar-looking jews led the charge in Western societies for the social acceptance of the dissimilar-looking ones, and thereafter for acceptance of members of the other human species. Then, together, they laid claim to the lie of egalitarianism–that external appearance is apropos of nothing and therefore all humans are identical inside.

> Thus, no Gentile has ever had an authentic jewish friend.

I did actually. He was intelligent, degenerate, nasty, filthy, but also funny. But we got into irreconcilable disputes where he argued for something unreasonable or just objected to me in quite an abrasive way. He was quite contrarian, but so am I, so we did fit together in many ways. It happened so much however around the last months that I wanted to talk with him about the fact that we need to calm down with our beefs, and his choice was to double down on his abrasiveness. That was when I ended our friendship.

I only realized much later that he must have been a jew. If true, he wasn't of the usurious-subversive type, but the filthy pseudo-intellectual type.

their authentic persona is hating everyone but jews and treating them as cattle. that doesn't play well so the lie as they breath.

Already removed from viewing but not embedding. Amazing.