New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
65
posted 6 days ago by RealWildRanter on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +65Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
12
ChippingToe on scored.co
6 days ago 12 points (+0 / -0 / +12Score on mirror ) 4 children
I'm convinced this "AI" boom is old news to the intelligence agencies. There's no way they haven't been using and developing an inhouse version of what you see available for the public right now. Hobbyists were fucking around with this tech in r/SubredditSimulator ten years ago. The whole internet is fake and gay except for you and me.
11
dionysus2 on scored.co
6 days ago 11 points (+0 / -0 / +11Score on mirror )
You are correct. These “AI” companies are fronts for the control apparatus to leak military technology into the public sphere. Elon is an avatar for a lot of these projects. Whenever you see Elon, just think of him as a “self made” (dripping in irony) extension of the government, which explains all of those tasty government contracts he manages to accumulate.
antiretardant on scored.co
6 days ago 9 points (+0 / -0 / +9Score on mirror ) 2 children
Neural networks and statistical word prediction algorithms are a 1960s tech.
ChippingToe on scored.co
6 days ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
May be true but I don't think they had nearly enough RAM those days
antiretardant on scored.co
6 days ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
The tech progress was suspiciously consistent. The moore law held still for 50 years, which is not a law of the universe but just a hunch that guy had.

I think they hit the physical limits of processing units back in 1970s, but kept slow rolling the releases for the public to control the adoption of technology.

We as public consumers are only now (around 2018) getting to the physical limits of how small transistors can be.
TakenusernameA on scored.co
6 days ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
Yeah, I had AI books as a kid I bought from a used book store about programming some word predicition models in LISP (which is an all but dead language now to my knowledge, though it would be funny to see it make a comeback because it has more parenthesis than a rabbinical convention) that were probably written in the 90s. The only thing thats changed is that we have better graphics cards to run the AI at reasonable speed. I guarantee governments had the tech to run a convincing enough chatbot to shape social media in the early 2000s.
DeplorableGerman on scored.co
6 days ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror ) 3 children
how are we actually supposed to tell "us" real humans appart from, well, bots and the like?

even if say, i was to post incriminating, doxing pictures and info of myself, that could still easily be made up content, deepfakes and so on.
systemthrowaway on scored.co
6 days ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
There's no real way to prove it. I just assume anybody posting MSM talking points is a bot. And if it's a real person agreeing with MSM talking points are they any more real than a bot?
DeplorableGerman on scored.co
6 days ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
honestly, i've gotten to a point where i consider Noticers to be real humans by default with the word being out on anyone else. watch jews churn out Noticer/ConPro-style bots to poison our well u/#topkek
systemthrowaway on scored.co
5 days ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
I'm sure they already do everywhere, "based" accounts pushing shit like flat earth are probably an example.
DeplorableGerman on scored.co
5 days ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
i fell for flat earth, and i didn't even realize it until i was challenged on it. i thought i was accepting the "default". almost like ~~a~~ some kind of sleeper subconscious stance that was activated. scary stuff, man.

edit: i don't like those twatter influencers. i don't like influencers period. except for Christ God, of course :^)
onetimeuser on scored.co
6 days ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
immerse yourself in the discourse and your natural discernment will improve
DeplorableGerman on scored.co
6 days ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
be more social, basically?
onetimeuser on scored.co
5 days ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
well just chat with people online, offline, however you do it. and lurking around too. see how people & "people" like to respond, how they speak, type, etc.

or even just simply pay more attention in your usual interactions and lurking spaces.

you notice trends and patterns. sometimes people get exposed. over time it'll become second nature like with instantly knowing when mainstream news is spouting BS
DeplorableGerman on scored.co
5 days ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
got it. thanks for the great advice. God be with you and yours.
alele-opathic on scored.co
5 days ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
This was the whole point of releasing these technologies - to break trust in anything digital.

The main way is that you need to only interact online with accounts that you know belong to people that you know. Unfortunately, the days of the wild-west-ish giant online beer hall are basically over.
DeplorableGerman on scored.co
5 days ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
"oy vey, the internet is dead and we killed it! we want a internet of our own!" hmmm where have we heard similar before

> Unfortunately, the days of the wild-west-ish giant online beer hall are basically over.

at least we have ConPro, VOAT, NS subs etc.
alele-opathic on scored.co
5 days ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
> hmmm where have we heard similar before

You're not wrong.

Basically, methods do exist, but you need to have access to the site at the admin level. The primary methods for IDing influence bots are through cluster analysis, and you need to see who upvotes who for that to work.

Back when OG Voat was going down, and people were lining up alternatives, I was trying to tell the guys that all that is really needed is to make the votes public. If a comment says +31, hovering it should show a list of who the 31 are. Not only does that prevent tampering at the admin level (e.g. /u/spez tier), but it also allows clustering analysis to be done.

> at least we have ConPro [et. al.]

We could be drowned out it a moment. We exist because jews haven't decided to shut the place down. Seriously, what, are the admins going to self fund? Then the yids harass, just like Voat, which drove one admin away (Atko), and if that doesn't work they DDOS endlessly, making the hosting costs retarded, which is how they got Putt (in a roundabout way, it caused him to take on a jewish investor, who rugpulled him).

We really do need better, jew resistant, alternatives.
DeplorableGerman on scored.co
5 days ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
> We really do need better, jew resistant, alternatives.

haha AK-M go bang.
redkrab on scored.co
6 days ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
beautiful
Toast message