You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
20
TakenusernameA on scored.co
6 days ago20 points(+0/-0/+20Score on mirror)1 child
I am firm a believe all the faggot nonsense we see now was completely astroturfed by (((bot nets))), its too convenient for it to have blown up just as (((social media))) was pushed on unsuspecting normies, when before it was barely tolerated despite decades of (((hollywood))) attempts to normalize it, and often mocked openly.
6 days ago12 points(+0/-0/+12Score on mirror)2 children
Absolutely correct.
The origin of chatbots on the internet, at least in 2016, was arguing against people against vaccines on twitter.
Seriously, the origin of the modern chatbot was to argue provax on twitter. Because amplifying the provax position was worth making digital shills. Excerpt from my original post on this:
> In 2015, DARPA held an open challenge, where the goal was simply to quickly and accurately identify political chatbots - so called 'influence bots' - from actual users. The battlefield was Twitter, and the corpus comprised 4.1 Million tweets from just over 7000 users, all arguing for and against vaccination. Mixed in with these users was 39 highly evolved influence bots, **all of which argued for vaccination.**
> **Every Influence Chatbot represented a pro-vaccine stance.**
> Here's the whitepaper (read it - it's good): https://arxiv.org/abs/1601.05140
This is why we can never allow society to end up in a position where most interaction happens online.
The origin of chatbots on the internet, at least in 2016, was arguing against people against vaccines on twitter.
Seriously, the origin of the modern chatbot was to argue provax on twitter. Because amplifying the provax position was worth making digital shills. Excerpt from my original post on this:
> In 2015, DARPA held an open challenge, where the goal was simply to quickly and accurately identify political chatbots - so called 'influence bots' - from actual users. The battlefield was Twitter, and the corpus comprised 4.1 Million tweets from just over 7000 users, all arguing for and against vaccination. Mixed in with these users was 39 highly evolved influence bots, **all of which argued for vaccination.**
> **Every Influence Chatbot represented a pro-vaccine stance.**
> Here's the whitepaper (read it - it's good): https://arxiv.org/abs/1601.05140
This is why we can never allow society to end up in a position where most interaction happens online.
if thereis an internet,how come not online, seems natural
unfortunately the only (((solution))) to the (((bot))) problem is digital ID im afraid.
Too late it seems