New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
MI7BZ3EW on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
The thing about the "marriage debate" they didn't understand was suppose they did get the word "marriage". What are they going to do, rewrite every book ever written and put an asterisk next to the word "marriage" with a footnote saying "At the time, marriage was only between a man and a woman."

Suppose they get that word, though, and people want a name for marriage between a man and a woman. What word would they use? Let's say we call it "barfublex". Now we can just go back in time and change all the words "marriage" into "barfublex" and it will make sense.

But then "marriage" will mean something like when fags and homos decide to shack up and endlessly anally rape each other in turn. And "barfublex" will come to mean the holy sacrament between God, man and wife, that creates families and repopulates the earth.

Over the next hundred years, "marriage" will mean virtually the same thing as "shit". "Barfublex" will be worshiped as the foundation of human civilization.

And suppose the fags survive the results of their degeneracy, and they want to claim the word "barfublex" for themselves. Sure, take it. We'll just rename "barfublex" to "pumpletittybopkins", update the history books, and it won't be long until "barfublex" is considered the same thing as dog feces.

As for me and my church, we are calling it "marriage according to the laws of God". Go ahead and try to steal that. Now the government is no longer part of our marriage rite. Eventually, children will become chattel and we'll be starting a new government that represents us and defends our rights, and the rest of humanity can crawl in the sewers and consume dog shit.
Toast message