1 year ago10 points(+0/-0/+10Score on mirror)1 child
This would be based if it was for (((Communists))) and non-whites who will never assimilate, but with him seeming to focus solely on the enemies of isntrael, i have a bad feeling.
1 year ago10 points(+0/-0/+10Score on mirror)1 child
If this was for niggers and jews i would be all in. But you have a jew worshiping president than can take more rabbi dicks at one time than any porn star. Therefore it will probably be for us.
I don't think it's the case. It really sounds like it's about South- Middle American invaders who somehow got citizenship, but are still drug dealers, murders, gang members and rapists. If it were about deporting actual citizens, even these fucking niggers, it would be medially pushed up to a massive scandal, and even right-wingers would oppose it.
Also the jew-protection laws only go for bad goyim invaders who bite (((the hand that feeds them))). Even that is relatively timid, and the consequence is "oh no, a subhuman wasn't allowed to immigrate because he said bad things about jews!" To be clear - ANY reason to reject subhuman immigrants is good, because it should never occur in the first place.
The Eighth Amendment applies to prison conditions. Deporting citizens reads as cruel and unusual punishment. We aren't fucking 1900s Russia, we don't exile people.
Fuck it, if I still lived in america I'd take the deportation to el Salvador for the crime of antisemitism. And then form a commune with others who were deported for the same reason.
El Salvador has less crime anyway (very sadly). Odd place to choose deportation to in any case.
1 year ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
Serious question: why not execute them?
She's saying it would only be for heinous crimes and it's obvious that Trump himself is not able to keep these people out, let alone the next administration.
Why allow even the possibility that these criminals get back into the States and victimize more Americans?