Send this to the free palestine crowd
(media.scored.co)
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Toast message
While I don't doubt that Israel has scored more kills overall, given that they enjoy all the perks of their parasitic relationship with the US, it must be said that Israel *lies all the fucking time about everything*, and it might not be as easy of a fight for them as it seems on paper. That and jews are physically inferior to... everyone, actually.
I mean... even with all of this aid, and considering it's been nigh on 80 years, they still haven't been able to actually take Palestine. And conquer "their" entire land. They've been dealing with hamas and hezbollah for, ummm, how long now? And they got completely blown the fuck out by hezbollah in the 80s too, they couldn't even lie about that one.
And they want to create greater israel. Lol, lmao even. They haven't even been able to create lesser israel after 80 fucking years and with every western country on their dick. They think they're going to conquer from Sinai to Kuwait? They're on meth. Maybe they would have the capability for this if they were literally any race except jews.
Here's what's gonna happen - israel is going to secure nothing. Hamas will continue existing, it will be status quo antebellum. It will be a victory for hamas though, because they'll secure their existence for longer (the only way to secure your future with jews around is with a bullet). Just like every other intifada. Hamas will gain more support with the palestinian population, as it has been, because they know that there's no peace with the jew. This will continue until Israel destroys itself.
All of those arab countries up to Iraq, most recently, had soviet style military leadership styles. Where NCOs were virtually nonexistent in their armies and if an officer died or was unavailable for any other reason, the military unit ceased to function. The west, and aligned nations, place a much greater deal of autonomy unto NCOs. And the Chinese put an *enormous* amount of autonomy onto ncos and junior enlisted soldiers. This stems from the cultural revolution. The mention of the Chinese is an aside, but they have alliances with middle eastern nations now, and their command structure and orbat is more flexible than anything else that preceded it. Mao was nothing if not a good general, I must admit. Anyways
Here's why that was bad news for them: soviet style military leadership was notoriously horrible. It worked in ww2, it might have worked in the days before you could launch a missile across the planet. It doesn't work anymore.
Israel had a more adaptive and modern western style military command structure. And a shit ton of western money. At that time, it was mostly from France and the UK.
Now, things are different. The Arabs now use the western style military structure, or, more recently, the even more adaptive and less restrictive chinese military structure (despite China and the ussr both being communist, their militaries are the exact opposite in function).
So, israel becomes less and less effective as the Arab world adapts, arms itself, and adopts more modern chains of command into their armed forces, or insurgencies. That's why they have used the US to fight every war for them since they lost, badly, to hezbollah.
You can't just "kill the main bad guy and win" anymore, because there's always someone to replace them that's equally qualified and there's less importance placed on *individuals* than there used to be. Israel cant shoot a hamas officer or leader and cause them to wander around aimlessly without leadership anymore. That's the advantage of Israel's military in days past, that they no longer have because Arabs now do the same thing.