You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
8
WEFFaggotsMustDie on scored.co
1 year ago8 points(+0/-0/+8Score on mirror)1 child
This.
Electric cars were NEVER intended as the answer. They are a "soft quit" measure to get people to stop driving cars period. Much like how vegan fake meat slop is to try and get omnivores to stop eating real meat, rather than allow vegans to eat an approximation to meat.
What will happen is that as jewish world governments like the UN and EU move to make fossil fuels more expensive and artificially scarce, as well as making sure they're your ONLY choice through banning the sales of new engines outright (the EV market is collapsing as we speak, they just aren't selling), people are going to be gaslit into thinking driving and owning a car isn't a normal thing most functional adults should strive to undertake, like they already do for gun ownership.
This is to eventually push people into using government-funded public transport systems that will require your ID at all times. They will be able to track exactly where you are, what "money" goes in, and what goes out. Cash will go the same way for that very reason. Governments will get richer and exert even more control and oversight over their own people.
As far as I'm concerned, urbanist YouTubers and social media influencers are paid shills at best and enemy combatants at worst who are trying to accelerate this gross violation of our human autonomy rights by demonizing the car, instead of the city infrastructure they intend to alleviate.
This is what I've been saying for years. They want cars to be too expensive to maintain, it's why they did cash for clunkers back in 2009 and started making ICE like shit afterwards.
>Economist (((Alan Blinder))) helped popularize the idea of a scrappage program and the moniker "cash for clunkers" with his July 2008 op-ed piece in The New York Times. Blinder argued that a cash-for-clunkers program would have a three-pronged purpose of helping the environment, stimulating the economy, and reducing economic inequality.
>(((Jack Hidary))) of Smart Transportation and Bracken Hendricks of the Center for American Progress co-wrote a paper that was distributed to congressional offices in November 2008 describing the multiple benefits of a cash-for-clunkers program.
Electric cars were NEVER intended as the answer. They are a "soft quit" measure to get people to stop driving cars period. Much like how vegan fake meat slop is to try and get omnivores to stop eating real meat, rather than allow vegans to eat an approximation to meat.
What will happen is that as jewish world governments like the UN and EU move to make fossil fuels more expensive and artificially scarce, as well as making sure they're your ONLY choice through banning the sales of new engines outright (the EV market is collapsing as we speak, they just aren't selling), people are going to be gaslit into thinking driving and owning a car isn't a normal thing most functional adults should strive to undertake, like they already do for gun ownership.
This is to eventually push people into using government-funded public transport systems that will require your ID at all times. They will be able to track exactly where you are, what "money" goes in, and what goes out. Cash will go the same way for that very reason. Governments will get richer and exert even more control and oversight over their own people.
As far as I'm concerned, urbanist YouTubers and social media influencers are paid shills at best and enemy combatants at worst who are trying to accelerate this gross violation of our human autonomy rights by demonizing the car, instead of the city infrastructure they intend to alleviate.
>Economist (((Alan Blinder))) helped popularize the idea of a scrappage program and the moniker "cash for clunkers" with his July 2008 op-ed piece in The New York Times. Blinder argued that a cash-for-clunkers program would have a three-pronged purpose of helping the environment, stimulating the economy, and reducing economic inequality.
>(((Jack Hidary))) of Smart Transportation and Bracken Hendricks of the Center for American Progress co-wrote a paper that was distributed to congressional offices in November 2008 describing the multiple benefits of a cash-for-clunkers program.