"That happened so long ago, why do you care?" Now do the holohoax
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
35 comments:
Wtf is going on with those eyebrows
Even if I agreed with what shapiro said, he is so physically and audibly nauseating that I could never watch his show.
I don't agree with anything he says, ever, but what he let slip out about popular conspiracy theories from the left 60 years ago (about israel) was something i hadn't put together yet.
Claims not to care about us asking questions.
Implies his tribe in our questions.
Then insists that we stop asking questions.
*Hmm.*
Implies his tribe in our questions.
Then insists that we stop asking questions.
*Hmm.*
"Do you have any evidence of a jewish conspiracy controlling the American federal government?"
Consulting the ADL to curtail free speech. Police/military trained in Israel. Every president kissing the wall. Trump cuts aid to and imposes tariffs on every country EXCEPT ISRAEL (which increases). EVERY MEMBER OF CONGRESS HAS AN "AIPAC GUY." [Also this fucking bullshit](https://cdn.videy.co/4kAeuIiw1.mp4).
So... yes, yes we have evidence. I like Michael Knowles and Matt Walsh, but I can barely listen to anything DailyWire anymore because of the fucking braindead takes they're forced to take when any jewish question arises.
Consulting the ADL to curtail free speech. Police/military trained in Israel. Every president kissing the wall. Trump cuts aid to and imposes tariffs on every country EXCEPT ISRAEL (which increases). EVERY MEMBER OF CONGRESS HAS AN "AIPAC GUY." [Also this fucking bullshit](https://cdn.videy.co/4kAeuIiw1.mp4).
So... yes, yes we have evidence. I like Michael Knowles and Matt Walsh, but I can barely listen to anything DailyWire anymore because of the fucking braindead takes they're forced to take when any jewish question arises.
And as soon as you present the evidence they think their intelligence is on trial. So the next thing they say is This doesn't prove what you're saying is true. That's when you know you're dealing with an NPC/ jew.
The standard of "proof" should be reserved for mathematics and hard sciences.
In the case of sociological matters, the standard shouldn't be to "prove" something, but instead to "remove all reasonable doubt" (as it is in court). You seldom prove a murder, but you create a scenario in the mind of the judge/jurors of "I don't see how this story could be false."
And you should feel free to point that out. "No, I don't have proof that jews conspired to kill Kennedy/facilitate 9/11 etc., but given Mossad's massive espionage campaign, Congressional capture, [media capture](https://www.jta.org/2017/12/18/united-states/the-sulzberger-family-a-complicated-jewish-legacy-at-the-new-york-times), major banking capture, the Rothschilds, the Soros...es, the Lavon Affair, USS Liberty, etc. etc... - I'm not averse to the belief that jews are behind most of the horrible shit today."
I mean that's kinda how I came to it myself honestly. Thought it was all just funny internet banter. Then I started paying attention. Kinda like niggers, pajeets, etc... stereotypes don't just form in a vacuum. They exist because they're true.
In the case of sociological matters, the standard shouldn't be to "prove" something, but instead to "remove all reasonable doubt" (as it is in court). You seldom prove a murder, but you create a scenario in the mind of the judge/jurors of "I don't see how this story could be false."
And you should feel free to point that out. "No, I don't have proof that jews conspired to kill Kennedy/facilitate 9/11 etc., but given Mossad's massive espionage campaign, Congressional capture, [media capture](https://www.jta.org/2017/12/18/united-states/the-sulzberger-family-a-complicated-jewish-legacy-at-the-new-york-times), major banking capture, the Rothschilds, the Soros...es, the Lavon Affair, USS Liberty, etc. etc... - I'm not averse to the belief that jews are behind most of the horrible shit today."
I mean that's kinda how I came to it myself honestly. Thought it was all just funny internet banter. Then I started paying attention. Kinda like niggers, pajeets, etc... stereotypes don't just form in a vacuum. They exist because they're true.
For the evidence deniers there's a mental (((semantics))) problem:
- When you tell them "jews were behind it", in their mind you just said "the jews are behind all bad things".
- This of course could be shown with enough time, but it can't be immediately demonstrated, so you already lost your argument to their strawman understanding.
What you're really doing is informing them that, out of all ethnicities that exist in the world, jews facilitated this/that event or social condition.
It should be emphasized that there should be no jews behind any bad event or social conditions EVER for there to be reasonable doubt that jews are behind any social problem.
That they are .02% of the world population.
That the odds of their maliscious involvement in world events over the past 2000 years being coincidental are worse than winning the lottery once in 1000 lifetimes.
I submit that as proof.
Like you said, once it becomes clear the first time the less it becomes funny internet banter and the more everything else starts making sense.
For me, it was the full page ad in the NYT listing 600 jewish groups supporting BLM in the summer of love riots.
- When you tell them "jews were behind it", in their mind you just said "the jews are behind all bad things".
- This of course could be shown with enough time, but it can't be immediately demonstrated, so you already lost your argument to their strawman understanding.
What you're really doing is informing them that, out of all ethnicities that exist in the world, jews facilitated this/that event or social condition.
It should be emphasized that there should be no jews behind any bad event or social conditions EVER for there to be reasonable doubt that jews are behind any social problem.
That they are .02% of the world population.
That the odds of their maliscious involvement in world events over the past 2000 years being coincidental are worse than winning the lottery once in 1000 lifetimes.
I submit that as proof.
Like you said, once it becomes clear the first time the less it becomes funny internet banter and the more everything else starts making sense.
For me, it was the full page ad in the NYT listing 600 jewish groups supporting BLM in the summer of love riots.
I'm not so quick to judge. Historically, men have used the systems in which they exist to dismantle the system. Teddy Roosevelt worked the gears of the corrupt political machine in New York to become president and turn around and bust up the corporate monopolies and corruption that got him there. Adolf Hitler succeeded in Weimar Germany and turned it into Nazi Germany.
Tucker Carlson was a Shabbos goy on Fox News; now he's got his own show and he's espousing more aggressive political views.
If Walsh and Knowles were out there on their own doing this, that'd be one thing. But they're still growing. I think Knowles is a little too milquetoast on the JQ - too many "jewish friends" as he says (likely just moneylenders, fucking duh). But Walsh seems to genuinely not give a fuck at times.
And y'know, Knowles is a pretty staunch Catholic. I've got a feeling if the jews did fully to Christians what they want to do (and they will soon enough), he'd change his tune.
Tucker Carlson was a Shabbos goy on Fox News; now he's got his own show and he's espousing more aggressive political views.
If Walsh and Knowles were out there on their own doing this, that'd be one thing. But they're still growing. I think Knowles is a little too milquetoast on the JQ - too many "jewish friends" as he says (likely just moneylenders, fucking duh). But Walsh seems to genuinely not give a fuck at times.
And y'know, Knowles is a pretty staunch Catholic. I've got a feeling if the jews did fully to Christians what they want to do (and they will soon enough), he'd change his tune.
> # ADL
> **Hate Symbols**
> wink wink
> Now blinking your eyes is considered a hate symbol
Every single time.
> **Hate Symbols**
> wink wink
> Now blinking your eyes is considered a hate symbol
Every single time.
Ah yes so historical events that have happened longer than some convenient arbitrary number, have no effect on the current time line, says the jew.
I wouldn’t have even thought about jews in relation to jfk’s assassination. Until jews started being like “WHY IS JFK FILES SO ANTISEMETIC!!!”
Toast message
Ben understandably gets a little nervous in his commentary.
He desperately tries to deflect the importance of the JFK files being released as they contain the evidence of democrats' conspiracy theories for the past 60 years of israel, mossad, US jewish involvement in JFK's assassination.
u/#smug
Enter (((sexual revolution, women's liberation, Vatican II, loss of gold standard, gas shortages, civil rights act, hart-celler act, etc.)))
One faction went left into degenerate communism, the other went right into what remained of Christian morality that ultimately led into modern day zionism.
The left hates jews because they killed JFK, and they hate Christians who love and protect the people who killed JFK. Meanwhile, Christians don't even hate sin anymore thanks to zionism.
Every. Single. Time.
u/#insane
Which means they arent even real Christians, because the central teaching of Christ wasnt just Forgiveness, it was Repentance even more so. The necessity of Repentance being required for forgiveness is one of the main things absent from scolfeldite dispensationalism, because otherwise theyd have to admit the jews are a reprobate nation that rejects Christ as God-King, and therefore have no right to the Holy Land, which was given to the actual Israelites with the strings attached that they didnt fall into idolatry and reject Christ, and Kabbala is Antinomian Gnosticism, and therefore the *synthesis* of all Idolatry in the same way Modernism is the synthesis of all Heresy. (Its also highly likely the jews arent even racially Hebrew, but frauds who took over the skinsuit of a dying race in the early 4th century in the same way Antinomians tried to skinsuit Christianity)
* LBJ's first act as POTUS was to send Israhell those planes and tanks.
If this were an insurance claim, the fraud would have been obvious to anyone.