New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
53
posted 1 year ago by XBX_X on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +53Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
25
Butttoucha9k on scored.co
1 year ago 25 points (+0 / -0 / +25Score on mirror ) 2 children
Ugly old women will always be the antagonists of a good society unless given a controlled purpose in it. And for good reason. They have no value or self worth in it and they know it.

They can't compete with men, they can't make babies, and they weren't chosen as a wife. They have no purpose other than anger and resentment at their lot.
14
TakenusernameA on scored.co
1 year ago 14 points (+0 / -0 / +14Score on mirror )
Thats why nunneries are so important, they give otherwise childless women something to do (mainly a bunch of chores) instead of ruining society.
13
Breadpilled on scored.co
1 year ago 13 points (+0 / -0 / +13Score on mirror )
The frustrating thing too is that it's absolutely possible to give them that purpose, even though it's ideal to just have no childless spinsters in the first place.

I briefly knew an old lady that drove school bus. She had no children, and was clearly directing her unchanneled maternal instincts into the job, despite outwardly treating it as nothing more than that. She had homemade name tags taped above the children's assigned seats, proactively managed behavior, had rewards in place for following rules.

Even though it was sad, she seemed relatively content, far more so than any of the bitches in the OP. There are roles where we could placate the childless women, but the state is intentional in harnessing their despair into a destructive force.

If niggers are the physical bioweapon, childless feminists are the psychic bioweapon (especially the jewish ones.)
Toast message