hart cellar passed in 1965, so white ingenuity had already fallen to marxist subversion
white ingenuity is what allows us to see the fraudulent claims from NASA
fraudulent claim number one, the F-1 rocket had 600 tons of thrust
they never let other whites verify this number, and now we cant even build a new one because we forgot. the obvious conclusion is that a 1 for 1 reproduction engine would fall very short of the 600 tons of thrust, an absurd claim
fraudulent claim number 2, the apollo 11 saturn V rocket was 25 kilometers in the air just 100 seconds after launch
phil polacia was a white man who filmed an unbroken shot of apollo 11 taking off, and 100 seconds after the launch it clearly punches a hole through a cirrus cloud
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0BZotXmZDIE
cirrus clouds topped out at 12 km that day, half the height that NASA was claiming the rocket should already be.....the rocket was moving too slow to go to the moon, thats why all the videos of the launch that come from NASA very carefully omit the stuff you see in phil polacias independent recording
fraudulent claim number three, kodak ektachrome is impervious to low pressure
kodak ektachrome film is stable down to about 1 PSI, after that the emulsion begins to boil off and any photos you develop after that will show "fogging" and smearing
that means the film would be fine while still in the command module or the LEM, at 5 PSI, but when we see them do a cartridge change on the lunar surface the 10^-13 Torr vacuum would fog that film instantly
white ingenuity is what allows us to see the fraudulent claims from NASA
fraudulent claim number one, the F-1 rocket had 600 tons of thrust
they never let other whites verify this number, and now we cant even build a new one because we forgot. the obvious conclusion is that a 1 for 1 reproduction engine would fall very short of the 600 tons of thrust, an absurd claim
fraudulent claim number 2, the apollo 11 saturn V rocket was 25 kilometers in the air just 100 seconds after launch
phil polacia was a white man who filmed an unbroken shot of apollo 11 taking off, and 100 seconds after the launch it clearly punches a hole through a cirrus cloud
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0BZotXmZDIE
cirrus clouds topped out at 12 km that day, half the height that NASA was claiming the rocket should already be.....the rocket was moving too slow to go to the moon, thats why all the videos of the launch that come from NASA very carefully omit the stuff you see in phil polacias independent recording
fraudulent claim number three, kodak ektachrome is impervious to low pressure
kodak ektachrome film is stable down to about 1 PSI, after that the emulsion begins to boil off and any photos you develop after that will show "fogging" and smearing
that means the film would be fine while still in the command module or the LEM, at 5 PSI, but when we see them do a cartridge change on the lunar surface the 10^-13 Torr vacuum would fog that film instantly