New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
Disclaimer, I am 1) talking about the US and 2) talking about the current laws not what I think the laws ought to be.

You have to pay taxes on income.

You also have to pay taxes on gifts.

Say someone gifted you something incredibly valuable, like a house. You have to pay taxes on that gift.

Say you don't have the money to pay taxes on the gift, then what?

Say the gift-giver of the house is also willing to pay your taxes.

That would ALSO count as taxable income which you would need to declare and pay taxes on.

Essentially, it's illegal to give things to people whose cash on hand is below a certain threshold.
You must log in or sign up to comment
37 comments:
14
Brannvesen on scored.co
1 year ago 14 points (+0 / -0 / +14Score on mirror )
Notice the similarities with property tax, if you can't afford that you'll have to sell your house, pay the capital gains tax and then pay the property tax only to have breadcrumbs left. No wonder people become homeless.
deleted 1 year ago 10 points (+0 / -0 / +10Score on mirror ) 3 children
17
thestretchingrectum on scored.co
1 year ago 17 points (+0 / -0 / +17Score on mirror ) 3 children
It's because people that have nothing are allowed to vote for free crap. So they vote to take my money to support their degeneracy.
deleted 1 year ago 9 points (+0 / -0 / +9Score on mirror )
Tourgen on scored.co
1 year ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror )
that's part of the reason, but only part. and it's the only part libertarian jews will allow to be said openly.

another part of the reason is that money is power, and building generational wealth dilutes the power of the current elite class. taxes are a very effective way to put a very strong downward pressure on effective, exceptional people originating in the lower classes.
HimmlerWasRight88 on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
And that's why National Socialism is about building the social fabric first; because no economic or political system can work in a fragmented society where everyone tries to rip each other off.

Note how the Jewish intellectuals completely ignore this point and propose various economic systems, from free market to communism, which rely only on individual self interest.
thestretchingrectum on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
Socialism is the forced restructuring of wealth. It doesn't work except by force, because noone thinks the same, and we will never all be on the same page here in America. It might work for small single ethnicity countries that have one cultural aspect since conception. It will not work on a grand scale, ever.
HimmlerWasRight88 on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
Socialism of National Socialism has nothing to do with the Marxian socialism that you're thinking of.

But even the Marxian socialism does work. It took a country back in the stone age, Russia, and turned it in the second world superpower.

The meme of "socialism/communism doesn't work" is just a stupid meme popular among boomers.
thestretchingrectum on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Like i said, single ethnicity and single cultural aspect. Extra ethnicity and multi cultural intermingling tear this apart, as noone does the exact same thing, and everyone is greedy, myself included. Socialism is forced, taken from me as earned, and given to you as free. Whether you need it or not.

Generosity in capitalism, and not cronyism and hoarding of resources should be encouraged. If you look at the US system, there can be no generosity, because it is too controlled. True free market without government ties is the way.
TakenusernameA on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
We really should have had a monarchy, unfortunately the (((Masons))) would have never allowed it, or would have just made us a colony again.
deleted 1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 2 children
Brannvesen on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 2 children
It could work if each county/city had it's own king. Then that king would never be too far away from the people, and never have enough defense to resist a lynch mob large enough. Dictatorships and democracies alike both works best in small scale.

Better yet, if one finds a successful way to make his town great, the others can copy that model. Problem with America is that it's too big, people don't bother to travel all the way to DC to take out the government, not even when they fuck around big time.
thestretchingrectum on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
The ability to leave a place and incorporate into a different one, considering you learn and abide by their laws and customs, should be allowed.
HimmlerWasRight88 on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
The problem is that we're not at the times of Aristotle anymore.
A population can be competitive and therefore survive in the long run only if it can be organized on a massive scale. In fact it's even hard to think of a country as big and as full of resources as the US being completely independent from the rest of the world.

To ensure our existence, White people need to conquer the whole planet once again.
BeefyBelisarius on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
And that's why a monarchy should be paired with a strong aristocracy, to serve as checks and balances on each other.
Cleatusvandamme1 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 2 children
Brit cucks still don't understand the Jew problem
caravanofdeath on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
I think you're forgetting that kikes project their global power via American Christians. If it wasn't for America kikes would probably have been wiped out by now since they were losing 2 world wars before America intervened on behalf of their masters against the free White peoples of Europe.

I realise this will trigger many people on here who pretend to be "right wing" or "conservative" but who in reality are just Christcucks. America isn't a real nation, it is a propositional nation and is the global epicentre of kikery and liberalism. Its existence is a threat to the future of Whites and it has been keeping Europe down for 100 years. Americans should be agitating for secession, dissolution, and the end of your federal government, but instead Americans here, and on every other board I frequent, will always fall back to their pathetic pseudo-patriotism. 1776 bro! Guns and freedom bro! You're just a bunch of MIGAtards larping as right wing.
Zrupsloohg on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Europe never needed America to hold them down. The issue with Nationalists in Europe is that they are divided in Language, Culture, Economy and Identity. What is best for Germany is not what's best for Spain. What's best for Italy is not what's best for Norway. There's no good reason for Europe to unite since it would require the dissolution of their Identity and Heritage.

If America falls, Russia and China will compete for influence over Europe. [Neither of those countries will treat Europe kindly](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gjl61avW8AIpGLi.jpg).
caravanofdeath on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Europe is a collection of distinct ethnic identities with their own cultures, traditions and genetic lines. This American steamrolling of ethnos (because you're all mutts) is tiresome and somewhat makes my point. Americans are to a large extent incapable of shirking their liberalism.
Zrupsloohg on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Despite the post-WW2 consensus, the world isn't a museum; Identity is bound to be changed and forged over time. Just as the Angles, Saxons and Britons became English or how the Goths evolved into Spaniards from Castilians. None of this takes away from their culture, traditions or genetic lines. So long as there are enough differences to form an out-group, there will be friction. America also suffers this burden, but our strength lies in that our Whites simply know they are Americans.
deleted 1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Cleatusvandamme1 on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
Oy do you have loicense for those hate words
deleted 1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
thestretchingrectum on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
Income tax is voluntary, it's written in the law. Stop signing things.
ScallionPancake on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
How is it voluntary when if you don’t pay it they come take all your stuff / throw you in jail?
thestretchingrectum on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
You sign up when you sign tax forms for work, agreeing to pay and file. The problem is all the ways the feds skirt the common law using the admiralty jurisdiction concerning this under contract law. If you think I'm crazy, look it up. I haven't gotten out because I don't want the hunt me down headache, but it's there.
ScallionPancake on scored.co
1 year ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror ) 1 child
Well my point is, even if the law says X, if they enforce it as Y… whats the difference?

The law is what is enforced.
thestretchingrectum on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
If the law has "voluntary" stated at the beginning of it, and is enforced by force, there is your difference.
The law is not enforced, the will of the federal reserve and irs is.
ScallionPancake on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
OK, sure you can talk about this all day. But my point still stands…. If you don’t pay they send thugs to kill you.


Arguing how it’s actually a voluntary tax with a bunch of low IQ cops is not gonna get you anywhere but jail.
BringTheCat789 on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
>you would need to pay taxes on that tax payment

That is correct, but because you're not taxed at 100%, there still always exists a number where the recipient pays nothing out of pocket. That's why YouTube giveaways always give like $10k in cash or whatever in addition to the prize.

But, yes, the system is bullshit.
BeefyBelisarius on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 2 children
Pretty sure it's still legal to sell the house to them for a tiny fraction of the value instead of giving it as a gift.
Maskurbator on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
Yes, legal.
But if they were to assess it and determine that you sold is so far below the normal market value (what they think you should have sold it for) they'll consider the delta between the two figures as a "gift in equity".
TakenusernameA on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
unless your a jew
BlackPillBot on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
“Rent” it to them for free for as long as you’re alive then leave it to them in your will.
Toast message