You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
0
February22nd2023 on scored.co
1 year ago0 points(+0/-0)1 child
Nope.
A small group of people would quickly devolve back into the cave age and lose the frames of reference to correctly transmitte the story. If they didn't die from inbreeding after a half dozen generations.
Even from a secular standpoint, modern humans originating from a small group is a [widely accepted belief](https://archive.ph/pz3Y9) with some variance. The main difference is whether to accept this was Noah and his extended family or the secular theory that Homo Sapiens simply existed and expanded out of Africa.
> The ‘Out of Africa’ model was the most widely favoured explanation accounting for the origins of modern humans. It suggested that modern humans originated in Africa within the last 200,000 years from a single group of ancestors. Modern humans continued to evolve in Africa and had spread to the Middle East by 100,000 years ago and possibly as early as 160,000 years ago. Modern humans only became well established elsewhere in the last 50,000 years. The different physical features now found in modern humans from different geographical areas around the world are believed to have evolved over only the last 60,000 years or so as a result of adaptations to different environments.
> Evidence indicates that Neanderthal and Denisovan traits emerge in Eurasia, while Homo sapiens traits emerge in Africa. Africa and Eurasia are isolated until H. sapiens disperses and interbreeds with the other two (and possibly some other unknown archaic species). Modern humans essentially absorb and replace the fragmentary local populations.
Though I hold doubts that the ancient races still existed after the Flood. Perhaps some of their wives had DNA from Neanderthals and other races which resulted in the confusion.
Regardless, several races were banished to darkness for accepting devils and became slaves for thousands of years. How bless would one be for being born among Abraham’s people rather than the dark races of the Canaans, Khazars, Asia, Africa, and the Americas.
A small group of people would quickly devolve back into the cave age and lose the frames of reference to correctly transmitte the story. If they didn't die from inbreeding after a half dozen generations.
> The ‘Out of Africa’ model was the most widely favoured explanation accounting for the origins of modern humans. It suggested that modern humans originated in Africa within the last 200,000 years from a single group of ancestors. Modern humans continued to evolve in Africa and had spread to the Middle East by 100,000 years ago and possibly as early as 160,000 years ago. Modern humans only became well established elsewhere in the last 50,000 years. The different physical features now found in modern humans from different geographical areas around the world are believed to have evolved over only the last 60,000 years or so as a result of adaptations to different environments.
> Evidence indicates that Neanderthal and Denisovan traits emerge in Eurasia, while Homo sapiens traits emerge in Africa. Africa and Eurasia are isolated until H. sapiens disperses and interbreeds with the other two (and possibly some other unknown archaic species). Modern humans essentially absorb and replace the fragmentary local populations.
Though I hold doubts that the ancient races still existed after the Flood. Perhaps some of their wives had DNA from Neanderthals and other races which resulted in the confusion.
Regardless, several races were banished to darkness for accepting devils and became slaves for thousands of years. How bless would one be for being born among Abraham’s people rather than the dark races of the Canaans, Khazars, Asia, Africa, and the Americas.