New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
TallestSkil on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 2 children
Maybe in a Samson scenario. You know, bringing the edifice down on top of them.
GoldenInnosStatue on scored.co
1 year ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror ) 1 child
I doubt we'll see it in our lifetime though, its going to be a slow boil for another 20-30 years while we are flooded by niggers
TallestSkil on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
I’m afraid so.
derkevevin on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
>Samson scenario

Do you think israel has nukes? And if so, how dangerous are they actually?
TallestSkil on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 2 children
I mean in the case of the shabbos goy. It’s possible for a shabbos goy to redeem himself, but it’s nigh impossible to *trust* such behavior unless he “Samsons” himself–that is, dies in the name of exposing the jews in a way they can’t even publicly ignore.

>Do you think israel has nukes?

The DoD has proven they have at least 300.

>And if so, how dangerous are they actually?

Their written and formal plan is to detonate a nuke in the capital/major cities of every country on Earth if Israel is ever faced with an existential threat, so since they already own every country on Earth and control all governments, pretty damned dangerous.
derkevevin on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
>I mean in the case of the shabbos goy.

Yeah I figured, but I thought I'd ask anyway.

>Their written and formal plan is to detonate a nuke in the capital/major cities of every country on Earth

Like they literally publicly stated that?

Edit: Also I heard someone suggest that their nukes are scuffed and could be used to blow up themselves at most. You think they got ICBMs?
TallestSkil on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 2 children
>Like they literally publicly stated that?

[Yep](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Samson_Option:_Israel%27s_Nuclear_Arsenal_and_American_Foreign_Policy). They’re all [too dangerous](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/By_Way_of_Deception) to keep alive, and we can’t kill them or they’ll kill all of us instantly rather than slowly.

>You think they got ICBMs?

They were given two nuclear powered submarines capable of launching ICBMs for free, so yes.
derkevevin on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
>and we can’t kill them or they’ll kill all of us instantly rather than slowly

They can't nuke all of us, and cities are full of niggers and libtards anyway. Them getting absolutely glassed by everyone in return would be worth it u/#topkek

>They were given two nuclear powered submarines capable of launching ICBMs for free, so yes.

Don't tell me the submarine we Germans gifted to them was one of them...

>By way of deception

By the way

>The title of the book is the English translation of the former motto of the Mossad, a phrase from Proverbs 24:6, be-tahbūlōt ta`aseh lekhā milkhamāh (Hebrew: בתחבולות תעשה לך מלחמה), which means "By way of deception you shall engage in war."

Recently [this was posted](https://files.catbox.moe/993u11.jpeg) and when I looked it up, some kikes claimed that this mossad motto is fake and a "mistranslation". So that's bullshit, huh? I mean obviously they're literally mossad lol, but it would be a nicer redpill to show to people, if it's real and they actually were using that motto at some point.
HimmlerWasRight88 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Your link on the Samson option does not say that you're saying in this thread.
Nuclear retaliatory strike is a policy of every nuclear armed state.

I don't feel like looking it up, but I'm quite skeptical of the fact that a non-nuclear power, Germany, is capably of supplying nuclear capably submarines.
They also need to be maintained at great cost, so it's unknown if they would still be operational.
WeedleTLiar on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
>it’s nigh impossible to trust such behavior unless he “Samsons” himself–that is, dies

You can't trust him but if he has the decency to remove himself from the equation, you can at least forgive him.
Toast message