There really needs to be a law against naming anything 'milk' that doesn't come from a mammal's teat.
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
18 comments:
13
1 year ago
13 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+13Score on mirror
)
1 child
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
3
1 year ago
3 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+3Score on mirror
)
1 child
What the fuck is RFK Jr. doing anyways? That babbling retard is useless. I thought he was going to ban fluoride in our water? Get that tard out of the tanning bed and back to work. Trump appointed a bunch of imbeciles again and MAGAtards lap it up like a dog slops up vomit at a frat party.
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
0
1 year ago
0 points
(+0
/
-0
)
Idiocracy is real
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
Question is, how do they milk them? Because that method has to be cheaper than a milk machine milking cows, which is very cheap per liter of cow milk produced.
Any form of traditional milking, i.e pulling something or touching them or whatever, heck even using sound that makes them milk themselves would be insanely time consuming and expensive with just a few drops from each cockroach.
I imagine a scenario were they crawl around on a large metal board, drop some milk, among their own feces and piss and whatever shit is on their shell, all ending up in the milk which is drained, or maybe they just crush them and take all that liquid as "milk" including blood, feces and parasite riddled shells.
Whatever liquid they extract, I doubt it'll qualify as "milk". And somehow it has to be many times cheaper than cow milk, although sold for the same price. It's (((beyond meat))) allover again, 60 times cheaper to produce yet sold for the same price as real met.
Any form of traditional milking, i.e pulling something or touching them or whatever, heck even using sound that makes them milk themselves would be insanely time consuming and expensive with just a few drops from each cockroach.
I imagine a scenario were they crawl around on a large metal board, drop some milk, among their own feces and piss and whatever shit is on their shell, all ending up in the milk which is drained, or maybe they just crush them and take all that liquid as "milk" including blood, feces and parasite riddled shells.
Whatever liquid they extract, I doubt it'll qualify as "milk". And somehow it has to be many times cheaper than cow milk, although sold for the same price. It's (((beyond meat))) allover again, 60 times cheaper to produce yet sold for the same price as real met.
I'm sure The Science(TM) used solid methodology, not a bizarre scheme designed only to produce a result approved of by world leftism. And I highly doubt The Science's(TM) study is a victim of the replication crisis (the ongoing phenomenon in science where the results of many scientific "studies" are impossible to reproduce).
Huh. Didn’t know invertebrates were mammals now.
Let's play "Guess the sleight of hand!"
I'm guessing they picked one nutrient among many possible options (I'm guessing protein) looked at just that one, and ignored all other health, hygiene, and bioavailability factors, and dismissed any possible unforeseeable long term effects, to declare that by this one isolated metric, blended cockroach is "more nutritious" than cow's milk.
I'm guessing they picked one nutrient among many possible options (I'm guessing protein) looked at just that one, and ignored all other health, hygiene, and bioavailability factors, and dismissed any possible unforeseeable long term effects, to declare that by this one isolated metric, blended cockroach is "more nutritious" than cow's milk.
Toast message