Just another 3.3% bros
(media.scored.co)
If you believe in voting at this point, there is still much work to be done.
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
45 comments:
All solutions begin with politics.
Mao was a retarded commie but he was right when he said that Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun
What happens at 50%?
Majority, but it's not needed to get much of your policy passed anyway as the opposition isn't one united blob being your polar opposite like red jew and blue jew in the US.
BSW I think is a leftist nationalist party promoting traditional values, they could definitely work with AfD in many of those questions.
BSW I think is a leftist nationalist party promoting traditional values, they could definitely work with AfD in many of those questions.
I think that Hitler won the election with only 40% or so of the vote because no other political faction could build a coalition larger than Adolf's
Think it was 35% even, with only two opposing parties. Wiemar (((sozis))) and the (((communist))) party. Which also ruins the "socialists = commies" bullshit. Those two opposition parties wouldn't cooperate.
It was after the Reichstagfire, started by the communist party in order to blame their opposition that NSDAP grew even further in popularity as they had a re-election just a year later. This basically happens when nobody have enough seats to form a government, only this time the choice was basically: continue with (((degeneracy))), support (((communists))) who literally burned the Reichstag or support NSDAP, the only sane option.
It was after the Reichstagfire, started by the communist party in order to blame their opposition that NSDAP grew even further in popularity as they had a re-election just a year later. This basically happens when nobody have enough seats to form a government, only this time the choice was basically: continue with (((degeneracy))), support (((communists))) who literally burned the Reichstag or support NSDAP, the only sane option.
Didnt the jews claim the Nazis did it to blame the commies?
Im assuming its another jew lie, considering all they do is project, and the German people obviously didnt think so.
Im assuming its another jew lie, considering all they do is project, and the German people obviously didnt think so.
Yep, and that is their usual (((projection))). It was the communists who started the fire and they went to jail for it. Law enforcement is segregated from the government unlike the US, so it's a lot harder to just arrest your opposition as the official story goes.
This might be why it's mostly Americans who believes it was NDSAP who started the fire, for seemingly no reason. As everyone hated the Wiemar party and both NSDAP and the communists were taking a lot of votes from the sozis. The difference is that NSDAP were a lot more popular than the communist party who really wanted to be in charge so in their last desperate effort they started the fire.
This might be why it's mostly Americans who believes it was NDSAP who started the fire, for seemingly no reason. As everyone hated the Wiemar party and both NSDAP and the communists were taking a lot of votes from the sozis. The difference is that NSDAP were a lot more popular than the communist party who really wanted to be in charge so in their last desperate effort they started the fire.
IIRC, the 2nd biggest party was the social democrats, who had made Weimar degeneracy legal. And then the Catholic party and the monarchist party worked together with NSDAP to make a majority and end all that.
IIRC, the first election they did OK for a new party. The second election they did tremendously well. The writing was on the wall that they would soon be a majority. Despite the opposition of the marxists, the rest of the country fell in line. The president (I forget his actual title -- was it Otto Von Bismark?) made Hitler the Chancellor and basically gave him a blank check to implement his reforms.
Truly democratic systems are weird. Once you get the "will of the people" you can pretty much do whatever you want. In Hitler's case, his greatest desire was to end degeneracy and take control of the nation's currency.
The US is not a democracy. Even if you win 50%, 60%, 70% you still get nothing. You need to keep winning elections for a generation before you can truly say you have taken over. Trump is running into this with the judges and the bureaucracy. The US was designed this way. Of course, the Founding Fathers thought that should things grow too unbearable, there would be a revolution and power would "devolve" back into the hands of the people and the militia.
Truly democratic systems are weird. Once you get the "will of the people" you can pretty much do whatever you want. In Hitler's case, his greatest desire was to end degeneracy and take control of the nation's currency.
The US is not a democracy. Even if you win 50%, 60%, 70% you still get nothing. You need to keep winning elections for a generation before you can truly say you have taken over. Trump is running into this with the judges and the bureaucracy. The US was designed this way. Of course, the Founding Fathers thought that should things grow too unbearable, there would be a revolution and power would "devolve" back into the hands of the people and the militia.
Imagine voting!
I'm done voting, fellow goys!
I'm done voting, fellow goys!
Voting in a real democracy (if your vote counts) can have real consequences, as we saw for the 1930's Germany.
Voting in a republic (which the US is) doesn't do as much as people think it does. That's by design.
Once we get the registration cleaned up, and after 4-6 years of consistent results, real change, permanent changes will happen. Thankfully, we already have laws on the book that Trump can use to hunt down and kill treasonous rat bastards. The fact that these laws were not used earlier speaks volumes about who was occupying positions of power in our country.
Voting in a republic (which the US is) doesn't do as much as people think it does. That's by design.
Once we get the registration cleaned up, and after 4-6 years of consistent results, real change, permanent changes will happen. Thankfully, we already have laws on the book that Trump can use to hunt down and kill treasonous rat bastards. The fact that these laws were not used earlier speaks volumes about who was occupying positions of power in our country.
The legal circumstances were different, Hitler wouldn't have gotten anywhere with modern laws and limitations. Yes, he and the rest of NSDAP were aware that bureaucracy was a farce and they were looking for ways to take absolute control, but they still had to follow legal procedures to avoid backlash.
Not really, the Nazi party was literally banned in Berlin, which is what theyre talking about doing to the even more tame AFD. I think it wasnt until the leadership of Germany tried to labor strike against France and it blue up in their faces that the Nazis started to get support because kept on pointing out how toothless the government was against its national enemies.
No, a majority of votes is definitely still needed to pass any proposals. If a single party gets over 50% it just means they don't have to make deals with any other party and can pass any legislature they want (assuming their own delegates are faithful).
Yep, point is, as long as a majority agrees on anything that thing can be done with ease. This is how one question parties can get any influence at all, which wouldn't be possible in a two party system.
Yes, judging by the sheer amount of fringe parties that have come and gone just over the past 20 years, it certainly is a lot easier for minority parties to get elected in Germany, though that doesn't necessarily mean they'll survive long term.
Democracy continues to be fake and gay, but Germans finally realize how fake and gay it is for the second time in human history?
I used to think the parliamentary system was superior to the two-party state in the US and then I learned that losing parties literally can just 'give' their votes to other parties and you end up with a result like "The results are in, the Baby Dick Eaters Party received 4.3% of the vote, awarding them 264 seats in Parliament. Meanwhile, the Maybe Stop Raping Children party, with 44% of the vote, will double the control from 1 seat, to 2."
Turns out that two-party systems are at least honest about what they are, parliamentarians are a total joke and undemocratic as fuck.
The only bright side is in the UK there's a position called the "shadow chancellor" which is a pretty badass title.
Turns out that two-party systems are at least honest about what they are, parliamentarians are a total joke and undemocratic as fuck.
The only bright side is in the UK there's a position called the "shadow chancellor" which is a pretty badass title.
Toast message
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6rlitz
but if you look at the map, it's East Germany AfD, West Germany CDU