Consume Product

Think it was 35% even, with only two opposing parties. Wiemar (((sozis))) and the (((communist))) party. Which also ruins the "socialists = commies" bullshit. Those two opposition parties wouldn't cooperate.

It was after the Reichstagfire, started by the communist party in order to blame their opposition that NSDAP grew even further in popularity as they had a re-election just a year later. This basically happens when nobody have enough seats to form a government, only this time the choice was basically: continue with (((degeneracy))), support (((communists))) who literally burned the Reichstag or support NSDAP, the only sane option.

IIRC, the 2nd biggest party was the social democrats, who had made Weimar degeneracy legal. And then the Catholic party and the monarchist party worked together with NSDAP to make a majority and end all that.

IIRC, the first election they did OK for a new party. The second election they did tremendously well. The writing was on the wall that they would soon be a majority. Despite the opposition of the marxists, the rest of the country fell in line. The president (I forget his actual title -- was it Otto Von Bismark?) made Hitler the Chancellor and basically gave him a blank check to implement his reforms.

Truly democratic systems are weird. Once you get the "will of the people" you can pretty much do whatever you want. In Hitler's case, his greatest desire was to end degeneracy and take control of the nation's currency.

The US is not a democracy. Even if you win 50%, 60%, 70% you still get nothing. You need to keep winning elections for a generation before you can truly say you have taken over. Trump is running into this with the judges and the bureaucracy. The US was designed this way. Of course, the Founding Fathers thought that should things grow too unbearable, there would be a revolution and power would "devolve" back into the hands of the people and the militia.

The legal circumstances were different, Hitler wouldn't have gotten anywhere with modern laws and limitations. Yes, he and the rest of NSDAP were aware that bureaucracy was a farce and they were looking for ways to take absolute control, but they still had to follow legal procedures to avoid backlash.

Yep, point is, as long as a majority agrees on anything that thing can be done with ease. This is how one question parties can get any influence at all, which wouldn't be possible in a two party system.