New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
43
posted 1 year ago by derjudenjager on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +43Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
AmericanInterests on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
One thing thats worth noting about "the holocaust" which is never mentioned in the hundreds of Hollywood movies on the topic (How many movies has Hollywood made about the American Revolution? 3) is that all of the evidence of "the holocaust" comes via the Russians. Throughout the past 100 years everyone has always known what massive liars the Russians are, so evidence of "the holocaust" from Russians should be taken with a grain of salt.

Some of the evidence of "the holocaust" provided by the Russians has already been proved fake by contradicting eyewitness accounts, for example in this video:

https://youtu.be/4-JM6ChF-Fw?t=275

Anne Frank's stepsister Eva Schloss explains how she knows the the Russians' films and photos of the liberation of Auschwitz are fakes and even got the Russian government to officially admit to having fraudulently staged that evidence. Since the Russians faked the liberation of Auschwitz, that calls into question the rest of their evidence, why would they fake the Auschwitz evidence and then use real evidence from the other so-called "death camps", all of which were in what was Russian territory
Parcival on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
What, the Stalanist Russians? Liars? You mean the people who were at the time pioneering photo doctoring in order to change historical records? The people who blamed Germany for countless of their own atrocities, including the Katyn massacre, until they were later found out? The people 1984 was literally based on?

Nah, they sound reliable to me.
Toast message