New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
31
posted 1 year ago by derjudenjager on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +31Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Brannvesen on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
Here's were the MiGA tards tends to get things confused. The jew can only run everything if they have leverage. So while MiGA often simp for eastern Europe, despite (((oligarchs))) and (((economic dependency))), that part of Europe is definitely very jew controlled.

In the west, but more importantly the north, all the countries are a lot richer. The number of jews are far less. People don't depend on the jew like they do in poorer places.

Sure the jew still control banks and the media, but they don't control the government, and that's were the antisemitic left comes in handy. 100 years ago, the social democrats were the ones being excluded, so they started to represent the people, they created unions, libraries, schools etc and took strong control over the government, similar to how NSDAP came to power.

So to put it simply, they do rely heavily on (((controlled opposition))) here. Especially in countries with no national debt, were the jew have no leverage at all, and antisemitic socialists openly support Palestine while not even recognizing pissrael as a country.

There isn't much right vs left bullshit either as most countries have parliaments and monarchy, parliaments generally gives much better representation as parties build their agendas on ideology rather than "oy vey! red jew say yes so blue jew must say no". Lot's of unexpected collations have formed in recent years.

Still far from a national socialist paradise tho. But it's theoretically doable.
Toast message