Consume Product

I think it's a powerful tool that can be used for good, but it will be corrupted as you say.

If it were well-regulated and used to a moral end - that is, mismatches are severely punished, all viable embryos are used (no discarded "extra" babies), limited strictly to stable, married couples who have a legitimate, chronic/terminal fertility problem that is measurable, etc. (I'm sure I'm leaving some things out, but it's just idealizing), then I think it could be an excellent tool.

But our society is incapable of the self control required to enforce that. We would note that niggers and faggots have notoriously unstable marriages if they get married at all, so requiring marriage is "discriminatory" (and fuck yea it is, for all the right reasons). We pervert the term "fertility problem" to include two dudes banging assholes (or lesbos/baginas) and not getting pregnant.

But a man can dream. I suppose that dream would begin by arguing *on behalf of the child.* If we always view IVF from the side of *what is best for the child*, then I think we have a shot at making the case for all of the above. There are all sorts of studies and data to back up that children do better in straight, White households with stable marriages.

But right now IVF advocates on behalf of some completely absurd notion of "a right to bear children." Fucking retarded - it needs to be completely inverted to advocate on behalf of the rights of the child.