When a jew see‘s a goy
(twitter.com)
That's gotta be the most manual labor I've ever seen a kike do.
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
23 comments:
14
25 days ago
14 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+14Score on mirror
)
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
The snakes envy us because we replaced them as God's chosen people.
They were never God's people. I don't know why so many of you here still persist on clinging to that idiotic notion.
honestly, after some studies, i think the situation is as following:
there's a buncha tribes all called "israelites", and they are indeed God's people, one way or another.
at some point, judeans split off from the "israelite" label, but still sorta count. judeans are immediately wicked as hell and disappoint God a lot.
at the same time, israelites themselves disappoint God a lot. israelites are scattered around, possibly mixing with other middle easterners or europeans. they're scattered really good, we have no idea where they went or if they're us. there's no "israelites" today.
judeans remain a little longer, then are invaded by Rome and get scattered too. they turn to matrilineality to remember who they are as they mix with a ton of different people. somehow, they stay cohesive enough to work their way up to a conspiracy where they get to own a country called "israel" in the modern day.
now, from where we're standing, it is disingenuous to even mention them and God in the same sentence unless it's to explain how much He probably hates them. but, objectively speaking, it seems the Old Testament was partially about them. i suppose you could say they are God's chosen, in the sense that they were chosen to become wicked beyond belief so as to test the rest of the world later.
there's a buncha tribes all called "israelites", and they are indeed God's people, one way or another.
at some point, judeans split off from the "israelite" label, but still sorta count. judeans are immediately wicked as hell and disappoint God a lot.
at the same time, israelites themselves disappoint God a lot. israelites are scattered around, possibly mixing with other middle easterners or europeans. they're scattered really good, we have no idea where they went or if they're us. there's no "israelites" today.
judeans remain a little longer, then are invaded by Rome and get scattered too. they turn to matrilineality to remember who they are as they mix with a ton of different people. somehow, they stay cohesive enough to work their way up to a conspiracy where they get to own a country called "israel" in the modern day.
now, from where we're standing, it is disingenuous to even mention them and God in the same sentence unless it's to explain how much He probably hates them. but, objectively speaking, it seems the Old Testament was partially about them. i suppose you could say they are God's chosen, in the sense that they were chosen to become wicked beyond belief so as to test the rest of the world later.
That's a pure fantasy that is deboonked by thinking of a simple fact: Yahweh demanded that the Israelites chopped their dick off. Only the Jews did that.
Israelites are the Jews and Christcucks are just doing the WE WUZ KANGS because they want to claim the Jews' god for themselves in hope for eternal life.
Israelites are the Jews and Christcucks are just doing the WE WUZ KANGS because they want to claim the Jews' god for themselves in hope for eternal life.
I dunno, feels like cope.
Jesus whupped the Parisees, rhetorically and literally, in "His Father's house". He recognized them as the priests and learned men of his people but saw that they were corrupt and prideful. If he didn't think they had some sort of legitimate authority over the people of Israel, why did he waste any time on them?
I think it's more a matter of God's chosen people (who continually sinned against him throughout the Bible, if you'll recall, frequently requiring punishment) finally tried his patience to the point that he gave them an ultimatum: follow my Son with any other people who chose to do so, or go to Hell.
The Jews of today are the (mixed) descendants of the ones who sided against Christ. Every other Isrealite converted to Christianity.
Jesus whupped the Parisees, rhetorically and literally, in "His Father's house". He recognized them as the priests and learned men of his people but saw that they were corrupt and prideful. If he didn't think they had some sort of legitimate authority over the people of Israel, why did he waste any time on them?
I think it's more a matter of God's chosen people (who continually sinned against him throughout the Bible, if you'll recall, frequently requiring punishment) finally tried his patience to the point that he gave them an ultimatum: follow my Son with any other people who chose to do so, or go to Hell.
The Jews of today are the (mixed) descendants of the ones who sided against Christ. Every other Isrealite converted to Christianity.
Look at the demonscript. That is a shapeshifting skinwalker.
Hebrew is the original language of God.
It has been adapted by demons and shape-shifting skinwalkers and defiled.
Consoomer moment: it's like how the black speech, the language of evil, in lord of the rings was written in elvish script, the language of a pure and good-hearted people.
It has been adapted by demons and shape-shifting skinwalkers and defiled.
Consoomer moment: it's like how the black speech, the language of evil, in lord of the rings was written in elvish script, the language of a pure and good-hearted people.
Funny how The Lord of the Rings is full of allegory and analogy about race realism while Tolkien was a shabbosgoy.
Tolkien hated intentional allegory, but his books are full of accidental allegory. The man was so opinionated on so many things that he really couldn't help himself.
He was a shabbos goy, but I suppose it can be forgiven because he lived in turn of the 20th century UK where *everyone was* a shabbos goy. Though, to his full credit, he was an outspoken critic of the German genocide and thought it was the most barbaric thing the allies could have ever done. Most British people at the time can't claim that. At all.
If he were alive with the internet today I am of almost full certainty that he would be a noticer. He was an unabashed reactionary on the far right of the political spectrum in his day. Everything he wrote is brimming with "I despise democracy and the mixing of people and globalism", and he talked about these things fairly openly as well.
We also don't really know what his political opinions were later on in life, after ww2 and the lord of the rings, because he kind of stopped discussing it, but I've read reports that after he had died in the 70s and they were clearing out his estate, they found... well, essentially a bunch of 3rd positionist, far right, newspapers there. Unverifiable, but considering what we do know about his beliefs, jumping to the logical extreme and saying that he turned after ww2 isn't an unwise assumption
I mean, politically he was essentially an anglo saxon irredentist, absolute monarchist, traditionalist catholic, and strong regionalist who didn't even believe in the mixing of 2 ethnicities from the same race. His entire worldview was literally poison to the jews. Makes me understand why they're bastardizing his work today.
He was a shabbos goy, but I suppose it can be forgiven because he lived in turn of the 20th century UK where *everyone was* a shabbos goy. Though, to his full credit, he was an outspoken critic of the German genocide and thought it was the most barbaric thing the allies could have ever done. Most British people at the time can't claim that. At all.
If he were alive with the internet today I am of almost full certainty that he would be a noticer. He was an unabashed reactionary on the far right of the political spectrum in his day. Everything he wrote is brimming with "I despise democracy and the mixing of people and globalism", and he talked about these things fairly openly as well.
We also don't really know what his political opinions were later on in life, after ww2 and the lord of the rings, because he kind of stopped discussing it, but I've read reports that after he had died in the 70s and they were clearing out his estate, they found... well, essentially a bunch of 3rd positionist, far right, newspapers there. Unverifiable, but considering what we do know about his beliefs, jumping to the logical extreme and saying that he turned after ww2 isn't an unwise assumption
I mean, politically he was essentially an anglo saxon irredentist, absolute monarchist, traditionalist catholic, and strong regionalist who didn't even believe in the mixing of 2 ethnicities from the same race. His entire worldview was literally poison to the jews. Makes me understand why they're bastardizing his work today.
"The population [of New York] is a mongrel herd, with repulsive, mongoloid Jews in the visible majority; and the coarse faces and bad manners eventually come to wear on one so unbearably, that one feels like punching every god damned bastard in sight."
H. P. Lovecraft
H. P. Lovecraft
If one of those rats spit on me i would knock all their teeth out then curb stomp their head.
Toast message