1 month ago18 points(+0/-0/+18Score on mirror)1 child
Turn on and switch off. Propaganda is a powerful thing. I remember in the 80s/90s she was on screen promoting her good deeds so frequently. Back then I was a boyscout and we were into doing some occasional charity for kids in need, and I always questioned why she chose wimpy pagan kids when there was plenty of Christian kids in need around the West specially in Central America. Now we know kikes love smelly kids.
1 month ago19 points(+0/-0/+19Score on mirror)1 child
The majority of organizations, celebrity charities and government agencies that claim to be champions of saving children are actually the worst of the kid diddlers.
Looks like that video only covers the religious side of her. When it came to the 'activism' side, if even half the stories are true, she was a monster, essentially a bagman for the Church who cleaned out every penny the poor on India had and then left them to die in her 'hospials'.
1 month ago8 points(+0/-0/+8Score on mirror)1 child
Its possible they were just rubbing shoulders at some meeting for famous people, considering in that image she looks like she wants nothing to do with him. A lot of criticism of her has come from anti-theist types (read, spiritual jews) trying to misinterpret what she said about the necessity of suffering or complaining she wasnt feminist. I really think she was well above board, though allegedly she did mishandle some funds.
1 month ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)1 child
I definitely want a sooource on that outside of some random schizo-posts, because she also did quite a few based things, like attempting to force jeets to behave like human beings.
1 month ago5 points(+0/-0/+5Score on mirror)1 child
Mother Theresa was a monster who took bribes from Baby Doc Duvalier (probably was partnered with him for child sex trafficking). She had a "hospital for the dying" where she prevented those with illnesses from seeing their family before they died of treatable diseases which she refused to treat because it was god's will whether they lived or died. She would refuse to feed them if they didn't pray to her liking. Everything she did was horrible.
who wants indian children? It is more likely they prevented people unsupervised visits to stop rampant indian rapes of the vulnerable. Als haitian, who wants nigger babies? it is more likely that the orphanage in haitis problems again were racism. From what I have seen so far and looked into all the anti mother teresea claims ( so far*) just come down to treating the way they handle inferior races behaviours as if they indicate something evil . There is no market for nonwhite child trafficking ( relatively speaking) so why do they have to fixate on the nonwhite hospitals and charity work of mother teresea for these claims?
I got you until you said there is no market for nonWhite child trafficking. In fact, this is a huge trade. I get you on the other points as that could be reasonable.
The trade is there but it is nonexistant next to white child trafficking unless you count the borders abducted children being used for special treatment when picked up at the border. There is like 1 nonwhite child for every 10 000 white children trafficked and it is usually just where they have little access to the white child markets
The photo has a weird look to it that gives me the impression it is fake.
Mother Teresa was a good woman but canonized far too quickly. Same with JPII.
Holy people are often demonized. Her work was hard as she was trying to perform a kindness for dying abandon people. Celebrity unfortunately attracts parasites that will tarnish your good works. She would have best remained obscure.
As a Catholic while it shocks me I won’t defend her for it and stop being Catholic. This is nothing new Catholics have not always liked the pope and other clergy and sometimes they did. After all they are human and I follow this principle of the Bible to its very core and that is “not to put your entire faith in the words of a man who can die and not come back to life”
The canonization process is usually pretty rigourous so I am sus of the anti prot claims legitimacy without any evidence. It is like when they say the pope is pro gay and then you look what the pope actually said and it was anti gay