>So "White grievance" is just an op to distract you from the Jews now?
I don’t know or care what the phrase is being *intended* to mean. I only care what the words actually mean. Whites have grievances against other races. By definition, this cannot distract from the jew.
>What's the implication here - that we need a multiracial movement against Jewish power?
How could that possibly be derived from the words being used.
>Antisemitism can never be a viable political first principle.
# Jew confirmed. Ignored.
>Defining yourself only by what you are against rather than by what you are for gives you no principle of loyalty or unity.
Fun fact: Whites are axiomatically antisemitic. I will never accept jews simply because you don’t want me to use words that explicitly reject jews.
>This is why the Jews flooded our countries with non-Whites
So that… we could all hate jews?
>precisely to undermine White loyalty
This isn’t happening within the context of “white grievance” as a phrase.
>We are not against Jewish power for the sake of it
Ideally yes otherwise they’d just flee to a non-white country and do the same old tricks. Could it be possible? Depends on the race but the races can do so in their own continents not Europe or America. If only whites revolt against the Jews then the Jews will flee to non-white countries and wait until they have the numbers to try again.
>people are overestimating the power of white grievances … ignorant chest thumping
Your homeland is calling for you. Go back to Morocco and you won’t have this issue. We don’t need nor want a non-white deciding if we have grievances.